Load Pair Disjoint Facility and Instruction Therefore

ABSTRACT

A Load/Store Disjoint instruction, when executed by a CPU, accesses operands from two disjoint memory locations and sets condition code indicators to indicate whether or not the two operands appeared to be accessed atomically by means of block-concurrent interlocked fetch with no intervening stores to the operands from other CPUs. In a Load Pair Disjoint form of the instruction, the accesses are loads and the disjoint data is stored in general registers.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a Continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/708,284 “LOAD PAIR DISJOINT FACILITY AND INSTRUCTION THEREFORE”, Filed Feb. 18, 2010, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to computer systems and more particularly to computer system processor instruction functionality.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Trademarks: IBM® is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., U.S.A. S/390, Z900 and z990 and other product names may be registered trademarks or product names of International Business Machines Corporation or other companies.

Before our invention IBM has created through the work of many highly talented engineers beginning with machines known as the IBM® System 360 in the 1960s to the present, a special architecture which, because of its essential nature to a computing system, became known as “the mainframe” whose principles of operation state the architecture of the machine by describing the instructions which may be executed upon the “mainframe” implementation of the instructions which had been invented by IBM inventors and adopted, because of their significant cotribution to significant contributions by inclusion in IBM's Principles of Operation as stated over the years. The Eighth Edition of the IBM® z/Architecture® Principles of Operation which was published February 2009 has become the standard published reference as SA22-7832-07 and is incorporated in IBM's z10™ mainframe servers. The IBM Z/Architecture® Principles of Operation, Publication SA22-7832-07 is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,785 “Posting multiple reservations with a conditional store atomic operations in a multiprocessing environment” assigned to IBM, filed Nov. 20, 1995, incorporated herein by reference teaches “More than one variable that is shared in a multiprocessing environment can be updated atomically. Each computer processor operating in the multiprocessing environment contains more than one reservation register which, along with this novel method, are used to place reservations on each of more than one shared variable. During the execution of a program, a plurality of shared variables can be reserved, each by its respective reservation register. A reservation is placed on a shared variable by means of a special instruction. The reservation register keeps track of: the address of the shared variable that it is reserving, the value of the modified results that are to be updated in the shared variable address, whether the variable has been updated, whether the reservation is valid, and whether the processor containing the reservation register has a privilege to update the shared variable. A reservation can be invalidated if a second processor tries to read the address of the reserved shared variable. When an instruction is encountered that tries to update a shared variable, the set of reserved modified shared variables designated by that instruction that have un-updated modified results are updated atomically if and only if all the reservations in the designated set are valid. If any of the reservations in the set are invalid, no shared variable in the set is updated. A condition code reports if the update was successful or did not occur. The condition code can be tested so that the sequence of instructions can be repeated until it is successful.”

Referring to FIG. 1A, representative components of a prior art Host Computer system 50 are portrayed. Other arrangements of components may also be employed in a computer system, which are well known in the art. The representative Host Computer 50 comprises one or more CPUs 1 in communication with main store (Computer Memory 2) as well as I/O interfaces to storage devices 11 and networks 10 for communicating with other computers or SANs and the like. The CPU 1 is compliant with an architecture having an architected instruction set and architected functionality. The CPU 1 may have Dynamic Address Translation (DAT) 3 for transforming program addresses (virtual addresses) into real address of memory. A DAT typically includes a Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) 7 for caching translations so that later accesses to the block of computer memory 2 do not require the delay of address translation. Typically a cache 9 is employed between Computer Memory 2 and the Processor 1. The cache 9 may be hierarchical having a large cache available to more than one CPU and smaller, faster (lower level) caches between the large cache and each CPU. In some implementations the lower level caches are split to provide separate low level caches for instruction fetching and data accesses. In an embodiment, an instruction is fetched from memory 2 by an instruction fetch unit 4 via a cache 9. The instruction is decoded in an instruction decode unit (6) and dispatched (with other instructions in some embodiments) to instruction execution units 8. Typically several execution units 8 are employed, for example an arithmetic execution unit, a floating point execution unit and a branch instruction execution unit. The instruction is executed by the execution unit, accessing operands from instruction specified registers or memory as needed. If an operand is to be accessed (loaded or stored) from memory 2, a load store unit 5 typically handles the access under control of the instruction being executed. Instructions may be executed in hardware circuits or in internal microcode (firmware) or by a combination of both.

In FIG. 1B, an example of a prior art emulated Host Computer system 21 is provided that emulates a Host computer system 50 of a Host architecture. In the emulated Host Computer system 21, the Host processor (CPU) 1 is an emulated Host processor (or virtual Host processor) and comprises an emulation processor 27 having a different native instruction set architecture than that of the processor 1 of the Host Computer 50. The emulated Host Computer system 21 has memory 22 accessible to the emulation processor 27. In the example embodiment, the Memory 27 is partitioned into a Host Computer Memory 2 portion and an Emulation Routines 23 portion. The Host Computer Memory 2 is available to programs of the emulated Host Computer 21 according to Host Computer Architecture. The emulation Processor 27 executes native instructions of an architected instruction set of an architecture other than that of the emulated processor 1, the native instructions obtained from Emulation Routines memory 23, and may access a Host instruction for execution from a program in Host Computer Memory 2 by employing one or more instruction(s) obtained in a Sequence & Access/Decode routine which may decode the Host instruction(s) accessed to determine a native instruction execution routine for emulating the function of the Host instruction accessed. Other facilities that are defined for the Host Computer System 50 architecture may be emulated by Architected Facilities Routines, including such facilities as General Purpose Registers, Control Registers, Dynamic Address Translation and I/O Subsystem support and processor cache for example. The Emulation Routines may also take advantage of function available in the emulation Processor 27 (such as general registers and dynamic translation of virtual addresses) to improve performance of the Emulation Routines. Special Hardware and Off-Load Engines may also be provided to assist the processor 27 in emulating the function of the Host Computer 50.

In a mainframe, architected machine instructions are used by programmers, usually today “C” programmers often by way of a computer application. These instructions stored in the storage medium may be executed natively in a z/Architecture IBM Server, or alternatively in machines executing other architectures. They can be emulated in the existing and in future IBM mainframe servers and on other machines of IBM (e.g. pSeries® Servers and xSeries® Servers). They can be executed in machines running Linux on a wide variety of machines using hardware manufactured by IBM®, Intel®, AMD™, Sun Microsystems and others. Besides execution on that hardware under a Z/Architecture®, Linux can be used as well as machines which use emulation by Hercules, UMX, FSI (Fundamental Software, Inc) or Platform Solutions, Inc. (PSI), where generally execution is in an emulation mode. In emulation mode, emulation software is executed by a native processor to emulate the architecture of an emulated processor.

The native processor 27 typically executes emulation software 23 comprising either firmware or a native operating system to perform emulation of the emulated processor. The emulation software 23 is responsible for fetching and executing instructions of the emulated processor architecture. The emulation software 23 maintains an emulated program counter to keep track of instruction boundaries. The emulation software 23 may fetch one or more emulated machine instructions at a time and convert the one or more emulated machine instructions to a corresponding group of native machine instructions for execution by the native processor 27. These converted instructions may be cached such that a faster conversion can be accomplished. Not withstanding, the emulation software must maintain the architecture rules of the emulated processor architecture so as to assure operating systems and applications written for the emulated processor operate correctly. Furthermore the emulation software must provide resources identified by the emulated processor 1 architecture including, but not limited to control registers, general purpose registers, floating point registers, dynamic address translation function including segment tables and page tables for example, interrupt mechanisms, context switch mechanisms. Time of Day (TOD) clocks and architected interfaces to I/O subsystems such that an operating system or an application program designed to run on the emulated processor, can be run on the native processor having the emulation software.

A specific instruction being emulated is decoded, and a subroutine called to perform the function of the individual instruction. An emulation software function 23 emulating a function of an emulated processor 1 us implemented, for example, in a “C” subroutine or driver, or some other method of providing a driver for the specific hardware as will be within the skill of those in the art after understanding the description of the preferred embodiment. Various software and hardware emulation patents including, but not limited to U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,013 for a “Multiprocessor for hardware emulation” of Beausoleil et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,261: Preprocessing of stored target routines for emulating incompatible instructions on a target processor” of Scalzi et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,574,873: Decoding guest instruction to directly access emulation routines that emulate the guest instructions, of Davidian et al; U.S. Pat. No. 6,308,255: Symmetrical multiprocessing bus and chipset used for coprocessor support allowing non-native code to run in a system, of Gorishek et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,463,582: Dynamic optimizing object code translator for architecture emulation and dynamic optimizing object code translation method of Lethin et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,790,825: Method for emulating guest instructions on a host computer through dynamic recompilation of host instructions of Eric Traut; and many others, illustrate the a variety of known ways to achieve emulation of an instruction format architected for a different machine for a target machine available to those skilled in the art, as well as those commercial software techniques used by those referenced above.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,870,598 “Method and apparatus for providing an optimized compare-and-branch instruction” Aug. 29, 1997 assigned to Intel®, Corp, incorporated by reference describes an optimized compare-and-branch instruction for execution in a RISC type microprocessor. An instruction sequencer implemented in the microprocessor is responsive to a compare-and-branch instruction for efficient execution. The instruction sequencer detects a compare-and-branch instruction and executes it as a regular compare instruction. On the next cycle the instruction sequencer translates the instruction into a branch instruction and provides the translated instruction for execution by one of the execution units. The branch is executed, either taken or not taken, and normal program flow continues. The Intel instruction has several drawbacks including that condition codes are set as part of the execution, destroying context settings that might need to be re-established.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An instruction is provided that accesses memory and sets an indicator indicating whether the access appears to have been atomic, that is to say that the data fetched or stored from/to memory was accessed without any intervening storage operation that may have modified part of the data accessed.

It is an object of the invention utilize this instruction for fetching disjoint memory operands comprising executing a first routine comprising instructions for fetching disjoint memory operands, said instructions comprising a Load Pair Disjoint instruction for loading two disjoint operands from memory and setting a condition code value. Responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, a second routine is executed comprising instructions for fetching the disjoint memory operands from memory. Responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, a third routine for using the loaded two disjoint operands is executed.

In an embodiment, the second routine is repeated until said condition code value indicates the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.

In an embodiment, a limit value is set for repeating. Responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, the second routine is repeated until either one of the second routine has repeated a number of times specified by the limit value or the condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.

In an embodiment, the Load Pair Disjoint instruction causes the two disjoint operands to be loaded into respective positions of a general register.

In an embodiment, a Load/Store Disjoint (LSD) instruction is executed in a processor of a multi-processor system. A Load/Store Disjoint instruction is obtained for execution, the Load/Store Disjoint instruction comprising an opcode, the execution comprising performing an LSD specified operation based on the obtained opcode, the operation comprising accessing one or more operands in memory. Responsive to determining whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory, a first indicator value is set, said first indicator value indicating whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory.

In an embodiment, the first indicator value comprises any one of a first condition code value or a second condition code value. Responsive to determining that a store event may have modified either a first operand in the memory or a second operand in the memory of the one or more operands during said accessing, the first condition code value is set, said first condition code value indicating any one of the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory may have been modified during said accessing. Responsive to determining that a no store event has modified either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory during said accessing, the second condition code value is set, said second condition code value indicating neither the first operand in the memory nor the second operand in the memory were modified during said accessing.

In an embodiment, the LSD instruction is a Load Pair Disjoint (LPD) instruction, wherein the accessing the one or more operands in memory comprises fetching a first operand and a second operand from memory further comprising the fetched first operand is stored in a first register designated by the LPD instruction and the fetched second operand is stored in a second register designated by the LPD instruction.

In an embodiment, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises a first general register field identifying a first general register, a second general register field identifying a second general register and a third general register field identifying said first register and said second register, a first address is obtained from the first general register identified by the first general register field and the obtained first address is used for the fetching the first operand in the memory. A second address of the second operand in the memory is obtained from a second general register identified by the second general register field and the obtained second address is used for the fetching the second operand in memory. The Load Pair Disjoint operation comprises storing the first operand in the first register, wherein the first register is a high order portion of a general register identified by the third general register field and storing the second operand in the second register, wherein the second register is a low order portion of the general register identified by the third general register field.

In an embodiment, wherein the obtained Load Pair Disjoint instruction further comprises a first displacement field and a second displacement field, the first displacement field is arithmetically added with the obtained first address to create a first memory address for the fetching the first operand in the memory. The second displacement field is arithmetically added with the obtained second address to create a second memory address for the fetching the second operand in the memory.

In an embodiment, store events from a plurality of processors of the multi-processing system are received and data of the received store operations is stored in the memory.

In an embodiment, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction defined for an computer architecture is fetched and executed by a central processing unit of an alternate computer architecture, the Load Pair Disjoint instruction is interpreted to identify a predetermined software routine for emulating the operation of the Load Pair Disjoint instruction and the executing the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises executing the predetermined software routine to perform steps of the method for executing the machine instruction.

The above as well as additional objectives, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following written description.

Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with advantages and features, refer to the description and to the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1A is a diagram depicting an example Host computer system of the prior art:

FIG. 1B is a diagram depicting an example emulation Host computer system of the prior art;

FIG. 1C is a diagram depicting an example computer system of the prior art;

FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting an example computer network of the prior art;

FIG. 3 is a diagram depicting an elements of a computer system of the prior art;

FIGS. 4A-4C depict detailed elements of a computer system of the prior art;

FIGS. 5A-5F depict prior art machine instruction format of a computer system;

FIG. 6 depicts example instruction formats according to the invention;

FIGS. 7-9 depict example flow of an embodiment of the invention and

FIG. 10 depicts example elements of a multi-processor system employing and embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Modern multiprocessor computer systems provide a means for two or more processors to access and modify common memory locations. Such locations are said to be shared locations, and each location is said to contain a shared variable.

Another context in which shared variables exist within a computer system is within a single processor in which separate and distinct programs (sometimes called processes) reside concurrently in the single processor. Each process takes control for a period of time called a quantum and at the end of the quantum, is suspended while another process is granted access to the processor. Execution of the processes is such that their respective time quanta are interlaced in time and granted on a round-robin or priority basis. The processes can access and modify common locations, and thus these processes in a single processor logically operate on shared memory locations as if they were executing on separate and distinct processors.

In either case, because two or more concurrent processes can update a shared variable, the potential exists for the update to be done inconsistently. Suppose each of two processes is assigned the task of incrementing a memory location. Each process attempts to do the task by reading from the location to a machine register, incrementing the machine register, and then writing to the new value of the machine register to memory. If Process 1 performs the Read/Modify/Write without intervention from Process 2, and if Process 2 then performs the same operations, the shared variable will be correctly modified by being incremented twice.

An inconsistency arises when the Read/Modify/Write operations of the two processes are interlaced in time. That is, if Process 1 reads the value of a variable X, then Process 2 reads the same value of X, and then the subsequent increments and writes occur in arbitrary order, each process will store the value of X equal to its original value incremented once. Thus the final value of X will reflect only a single increment. One increment will be lost.

The reason for obtaining an incorrect final value is that the two processes operate on inconsistent data. If Process 1 reads the value of X with intent to modify it, then the logical residence of X has shifted from shared memory to the private register associated with Process 1. If subsequently Process 2 reads X, and X has not yet been modified by Process 1, the value read by Process 2 is inconsistent with the actual value of X, because X is currently not accessible in the shared memory, and will not be accessible again until it is rewritten.

To assure correctness, it is necessary to assure consistency. A sufficient condition for consistent behavior is to assure that when a Read/Modify/Write sequence of operations is performed on a shared variable X, the sequence is performed atomically. By atomically we mean that the sequence is performed without permitting any other process to change the value of X between the time the Read X is done and the Write X is done.

There are many ways to assure correctness and consistency of Read/Modify/Write sequences of actions. One way is to enclose such sequences in a region of a program called a critical section. A critical section is preceded by one or more instructions that perform a locking operation, and succeeded by one or more instructions that perform an unlocking operation. The lock and unlock operations assure that at most one process can execute code within the critical section at any one time. If by convention or protocol, all other processes update the same shared variables by means of critical sections controlled by the same lock and unlock mechanism, then the Read/Modify/Write operations within the critical section can update shared variables atomically, because no other process can perform an intervening access to the shared variables while one process is in the act of performing a Read/Modify/Write process in the critical section.

To create a critical section, it is necessary to have a lock function. Within prior art, a common means for implementing such a function is by means of an instruction that itself performs an atomic Read/Modify/Write on a lock variable. Among the instructions used for this purpose are the Test-and-Set instruction and the Increment (or Decrement) instruction.

The Test-and-Set instruction reads a variable X, sets a bit of X to the value 1 regardless of the original state of the bit, rewrites X, and returns a condition code whose value is equal to the original bit before it was forced to be the value 1. Because this instruction performs a Read/Modify/Write of a shared variable, it must be implemented to perform such an update atomically in order to assure consistency of execution. This one instruction can be used to set a lock that guards a critical section in which a Read/Modify/Write sequence of arbitrary complexity can be executed consistently, since the lock prevents intervening accesses to the shared variables by other processes.

To use the Test-and-Set instruction to create a lock, each process protects the critical section with a Test-and-Set instruction that accesses a lock variable. Immediately after the execution of the Test-and-Set instruction, the lock variable will hold the value 1, regardless of its former value. Each process tests the condition code after executing Test-and-Set, and only the process that observes a code of 0 (corresponding to an initial value of 0) can enter the critical section and execute the Read/Modify/Write sequence within the critical section. All other processes attempting to execute the Read/Modify/Write code in their respective critical sections must wait or do something else until the lock for the critical section is in the unlocked (0) state. When a process completes the Read/Modify/Write sequence and leaves the critical section, it clears the lock by storing a 0 in the lock, thereby permitting another process to enter the critical section by executing a Test-and-Set on the lock with an initial value of the variable equal to 0.

Test-and-Set is found on the IBM 370. Increment and decrement can be implemented as atomic Read/Modify/Write operations, and can be used to do essentially what the Test-and-Set does, almost as a direct replacement for Test-and-Set. They are more versatile because they can increment and decrement shared variables atomically, while Test-and-Set can only set a bit. The DEC VAX has atomic increment and decrement instructions.

There are several problems with using Read/Modify/Write operations to create a critical section. Among these are:

1. A critical section allows at most one process to enter at a time. If a process enters the critical section and fails, the entire system fails because no other process can enter the critical section.

2. A lengthy and complex critical section is a performance bottleneck in a multiprocessor system. Since only one process at a time can enter a critical section, if other processes must enter the same critical section, they must wait until it is available, and they may be forced to be idle during this time. A desirable solution to this problem is to update the shared variables by means of sequences of instructions that perform Read/Modify/Write outside any critical section. This modification has to be carefully controlled so that consistency is maintained.

3. Since a critical section contains many instructions, a time quantum for a process can end within a critical section, and that process can be suspended for a lengthy period of time while other processes take control of the processor. During the period of suspension of the process that holds the lock for the critical section, no other process can enter the critical section and update the shared variables controlled by that critical section.

To overcome these disadvantages, it is possible to implement complex operations on shared variables as a single instruction performed atomically. As an example, the DEC VAX has atomic ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE instructions each of which changes up to four shared variables concurrently and atomically, and thus makes changes consistently.

If this approach is followed, the machine designer has to supply an atomic instruction for each distinct operation on shared variables for each data representation. For example, the DEC VAX has different ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE instructions for queues with different representations. Queues with one pointer per element must be manipulated by one of the ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE pairs of instructions, and queues with two pointers per element must be manipulated by a different pair of ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE instructions.

A drawback is that the machine designer must anticipate every conceivable atomic operation and every conceivable data representation, because each such operation is extremely specialized. This approach fails because the programmer cannot easily create and use a custom-made atomic operation for each particular context and data representation.

Therefore, an important problem to address is the ability to produce customized atomic operations for complex updates to shared variables, and to perform these atomic operations so that the actual update takes place during the execution of a single instruction. In this way, the reliability and performance of the multiprocessor system are not at risk due to failures or interruptions of a process that holds a lock for a critical section.

A partial solution to this problem is available through the use of the Compare-and-Swap instruction as implemented on the IBM 370. The Compare-and-Swap instruction provides the last step of a Read/Modify/Write sequence of instructions that is not protected by a critical section, and performs the Write operation only under certain conditions that are suppose to assure consistency and atomicity. To use the Compare-and-Swap, a process first performs by means of conventional non-atomic instructions all of the actions of a Read/Modify/Write sequence for updating a shared variable except for the final Write of the updated value of the shared variable. To perform the final Write action, the process uses the Compare-and-Swap instruction. The Compare-and-Swap rereads the variable from storage and compares the current value in storage to a copy of the prior value that is held in a machine register. If the two values are identical, the Compare-and-Swap updates the variable in storage with the newly computed value. If the copy of the prior value held in a machine register and the current value held in shared memory differ, the Compare-and-Swap does not update storage, and replaces the copy of the prior value held in the machine register with a copy of the current value of the variable in shared memory. The instruction reports what happened in a condition code. Since the Compare-and-Swap itself performs a Read/Modify/Write sequence of actions, those actions must be done atomically to assure program correctness.

The idea of the Compare-and-Swap is that a shared value can be updated if no other process has altered the value since it was last read. This is supposed to assure consistent behavior. Unfortunately, there is a possibility of an inconsistent update. While a first process is in the midst of performing a Read/Modify/Write sequence terminated by a Compare-and-Swap, it is possible for a second process, executing concurrently, to read the value of the variable (say value A), to change the value to a new value (say value B), and for yet another process to return the shared variable to the prior value (value A) while the first process is computing a new value based on value A. When the first process reaches the Compare-and-Swap instruction, the Compare-and-Swap will succeed because the current value and the prior value are both equal to A.

However, for many applications, correctness requires not only that prior and current values of the shared variable be equal, but that the variable in storage maintained the value A continuously between the time it was first read during the execution of the Read/Modify/Write sequence and the time the Compare-and-Swap was executed. The failure of the Compare-and-Swap to detect such a change of values is called the ABA problem.

Most algorithms for concurrent access and modification of shared variables may fail if the ABA problem can occur. There are various software schemes used in conjunction with Compare-and-Swap to eliminate or reduce the probability of a failure due to the ABA problem.

Another approach to the problem is very similar to the use of Compare-and-Swap, except that it detects whether or not a variable has maintained a value continuously at the time an update is attempted. In essence, the scheme works as if the Compare-and-Swap tests a variable for whether it has changed or not instead of testing for equality of current and prior values. The scheme uses a notion called a reservation.

The scheme uses two instructions, Load-with-Reservation and Write-if-Reserved, although the instructions have different names on the various processors that use it. It is in use on the MIPS® R-4000 processor, and on the DEC ALPHA processor. The Load-with-Reservation reads a shared variable from storage and at the same time places the address of that variable in a special register known as a reservation register. The reservation register monitors changes to the variable made by other processes, and those other processes can be those executing on the same processor or on other processors. If any other process changes the value of the variable, the reservation disappears. Otherwise it remains present until the process that placed the reservation reaches the Write-if-Reserved instruction. The Write-if-Reserved instruction performs the update only if the reservation is still present. If not, the Write-if-Reserved performs no update. In either case, the instruction returns a condition code indicating what happened. For many applications, the process then tests the condition code and repeats the Load-with-Reservation, modify, Write-if-Reserved sequence until the update succeeds.

In an embodiment, the present invention may be practiced by software (sometimes referred to Licensed Internal Code. Firmware, Micro-code, Milli-code, Pico-code and the like, any of which would be consistent with the present invention). Referring to FIG. 1A, software program code which embodies the present invention is typically accessed by the processor also known as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 1 of the system 50 from long-term storage media 7, such as a CD-ROM drive, tape drive or hard drive. The software program code may be embodied on any of a variety of known media for use with a data processing system, such as a diskette, hard drive, or CD-ROM. The code may be distributed on such media, or may be distributed to users from the computer memory 2 or storage of one computer system over a network 10 to other computer systems for use by users of such other systems.

Alternatively, the program code may be embodied in the memory 2, and accessed by the processor 1 using the processor bus. Such program code includes an operating system which controls the function and interaction of the various computer components and one or more application programs. Program code is normally paged from dense storage media 11 to high-speed memory 2 where it is available for processing by the processor 1. The techniques and methods for embodying software program code in memory, on physical media, and/or distributing software code via networks are well known and will not be further discussed herein. Program code, when created and stored on a tangible medium (including but not limited to electronic memory modules (RAM), flash memory, Compact Discs (CDs), DVDs, Magnetic Tape and the like is often referred to as a “computer program product”. The computer program product medium is typically readable by a processing circuit preferably in a computer system for execution by the processing circuit.

FIG. 1C illustrates a representative workstation or server hardware system in which the present invention may be practiced. The system 100 of FIG. 1C comprises a representative computer system 101, such as a personal computer, a workstation or a server, including optional peripheral devices. The workstation 101 includes one or more processors 106 and a bus employed to connect and enable communication between the processor(s) 106 and the other components of the system 101 in accordance with known techniques. The bus connects the processor 106 to memory 105 and long-term storage 107 which can include a hard drive (including any of magnetic media, CD, DVD and Flash Memory for example) or a tape drive for example. The system 101 might also include a user interface adapter, which connects the microprocessor 106 via the bus to one or more interface devices, such as a keyboard 104, mouse 103, a Printer/scanner 110 and/or other interface devices, which can be any user interface device, such as a touch sensitive screen, digitized entry pad, etc. The bus also connects a display device 102, such as an LCD screen or monitor, to the microprocessor 106 via a display adapter.

The system 101 may communicate with other computers or networks of computers by way of a network adapter capable of communicating 108 with a network 109. Example network adapters are communications channels, token ring, Ethernet or moderns. Alternatively, the workstation 101 may communicate using a wireless interface, such as a CDPD (cellular digital packet data) card. The workstation 101 may be associated with such other computers in a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN), or the workstation 101 can be a client in a client/server arrangement with another computer, etc. All of these configurations, as well as the appropriate communications hardware and software, are known in the art.

FIG. 2 illustrates a data processing network 200 in which the present invention may be practiced. The data processing network 200 may include a plurality of individual networks, such as a wireless network and a wired network, each of which may include a plurality of individual workstations 101 201 202 203 204. Additionally, as those skilled in the art will appreciate, one or more LANs may be included, where a LAN may comprise a plurality of intelligent workstations coupled to a host processor.

Still referring to FIG. 2, the networks may also include mainframe computers or servers, such as a gateway computer (client server 206) or application server (remote server 208 which may access a data repository and may also be accessed directly from a workstation 205). A gateway computer 206 serves as a point of entry into each network 207. A gateway is needed when connecting one networking protocol to another. The gateway 206 may be preferably coupled to another network (the Internet 207 for example) by means of a communications link. The gateway 206 may also be directly coupled to one or more workstations 101 201 202 203 204 using a communications link. The gateway computer may be implemented utilizing an IBM eServer™ zSeries® z10™ Server available from IBM Corp.

Software programming code which embodies the present invention is typically accessed by the processor 106 of the system 101 from long-term storage media 107, such as a CD-ROM drive or hard drive. The software programming code may be embodied on any of a variety of known media for use with a data processing system, such as a diskette, hard drive, or CD-ROM. The code may be distributed on such media, or may be distributed to users 210 211 from the memory or storage of one computer system over a network to other computer systems for use by users of such other systems.

Alternatively, the programming code 111 may be embodied in the memory 105, and accessed by the processor 106 using the processor bus. Such programming code includes an operating system which controls the function and interaction of the various computer components and one or more application programs 112. Program code is normally paged from dense storage media 107 to high-speed memory 105 where it is available for processing by the processor 106. The techniques and methods for embodying software programming code in memory, on physical media, and/or distributing software code via networks are well known and will not be further discussed herein. Program code, when created and stored on a tangible medium (including but not limited to electronic memory modules (RAM), flash memory, Compact Discs (CDs), DVDs, Magnetic Tape and the like is often referred to as a “computer program product”. The computer program product medium is typically readable by a processing circuit preferably in a computer system for execution by the processing circuit.

The cache that is most readily available to the processor (normally faster and smaller than other caches of the processor) is the lowest (L1 or level one) cache and main store (mnain nmemory) is the highest level cache (L3 if there are 3 levels). The lowest level cache is often divided into an instruction cache (1-Cache) holding machine instructions to be executed and a data cache (D-Cache) holding data operands.

Referring to FIG. 3, an exemplary processor embodiment is depicted for processor 106. Typically one or more levels of Cache 303 are employed to buffer memory blocks in order to improve processor performance. The cache 303 is a high speed buffer holding cache lines of memory data that are likely to be used. Typical cache lines are 64, 128 or 256 bytes of memory data. Separate Caches are often employed for caching instructions than for caching data. Cache coherence (synchronization of copies of lines in Memory and the Caches) is often provided by various “Snoop” algorithms well known in the art. Main storage 105 of a processor system is often referred to as a cache. In a processor system having 4 levels of cache 303 main storage 105 is sometimes referred to as the level 5 (L5) cache since it is typically faster and only holds a portion of the non-volatile storage (DASD, Tape etc) that is available to a computer system, Main storage 105 “caches” pages of data paged in and out of the main storage 105 by the Operating system.

A program counter (instruction counter) 311 keeps track of the address of the current instruction to be executed. A program counter in a z/Architecture processor is 64 bits and can be truncated to 31 or 24 bits to support prior addressing limits. A program counter is typically embodied in a PSW (program status word) of a computer such that it persists during context switching. Thus, a program in progress, having a program counter value, may be interrupted by, for example, the operating system (context switch from the program environment to the Operating system environment). The PSW of the program maintains the program counter value while the program is not active, and the program counter (in the PSW) of the operating system is used while the operating system is executing. Typically the Program counter is incremented by an amount equal to the number of bytes of the current instruction. RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) instructions are typically fixed length while CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) instructions are typically variable length. Instructions of the IBM z/Architecture are CISC instructions having a length of 2, 4 or 6 bytes. The Program counter 311 is modified by either a context switch operation or a Branch taken operation of a Branch instruction for example. In a context switch operation, the current program counter value is saved in a Program Status Word (PSW) along with other state information about the program being executed (such as condition codes), and a new program counter value is loaded pointing to an instruction of a new program module to be executed. A branch taken operation is performed in order to permit the program to make decisions or loop within the program by loading the result of the Branch Instruction into the Program Counter 311.

Typically an instruction Fetch Unit 305 is employed to fetch instructions on behalf of the processor 106. The fetch unit either fetches “next sequential instructions”, target instructions of Branch Taken instructions, or first instructions of a program following a context switch. Modern Instruction fetch units often employ prefetch techniques to speculatively prefetch instructions based on the likelihood that the prefetched instructions might be used. For example, a fetch unit may fetch 16 bytes of instruction that includes the next sequential instruction and additional bytes of further sequential instructions.

The fetched instructions are then executed by the processor 106. In an embodiment, the fetched instruction(s) are passed to a dispatch unit 306 of the fetch unit. The dispatch unit decodes the instruction(s) and forwards information about the decoded instruction(s) to appropriate units 307 308 310. An execution unit 307 will typically receive information about decoded arithmetic instructions from the instruction fetch unit 305 and will perform arithmetic operations on operands according to the opcode of the instruction. Operands are provided to the execution unit 307 preferably either from memory 105, architected registers 309 or from an immediate field of the instruction being executed. Results of the execution, when stored, are stored either inn memory 105, registers 309 or in other machine hardware (such as control registers, PSW registers and the like).

A processor 106 typically has one or more execution units 307 308 310 for executing the function of the instruction. Referring to FIG. 4A, an execution unit 307 may communicate with architected general registers 309, a decode/dispatch unit 306 a load store unit 310 and other 401 processor units by way of interfacing logic 407. An Execution unit 307 may employ several register circuits 403 404 405 to hold information that the arithmetic logic unit (ALU 402 will operate on. The ALL performs arithmetic operations such as add, subtract, multiply and divide as well as logical function such as and, or and exclusive-or (xor), rotate and shift. Preferably the ALU supports specialized operations that are design dependent. Other circuits may provide other architected facilities 408 including condition codes and recovery support logic for example. Typically the result of an ALU operation is held in an output register circuit 406 which can forward the result to a variety of other processing functions. There are many arrangements of processor units, the present description is only intended to provide a representative understanding of one embodiment.

An ADD instruction for example would be executed in an execution unit 307 having arithmetic and logical functionality while a Floating Point instruction for example would be executed in a Floating Point Execution having specialized Floating Point capability. Preferably, an execution unit operates on operands identified by an instruction by performing an opcode defined function on the operands. For example, an ADD instruction may be executed by an execution unit 307 on operands found in two registers 309 identified by register fields of the instruction.

The execution unit 307 performs the arithmetic addition on two operands and stores the result in a third operand where the third operand may be a third register or one of the two source registers. The Execution unit preferably utilizes an Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) 402 that is capable of performing a variety of logical functions such as Shift, Rotate, And, Or and XOR as well as a variety of algebraic functions including any of add, subtract, multiply, divide. Some ALUs 402 are designed for scalar operations and some for floating point. Data may be Big Endian (where the least significant byte is at the highest byte address) or Little Endian (where the least significant byte is at the lowest byte address) depending on architecture. The IBM z/Architecture is Big Endian. Signed fields may be sign and magnitude, 1's complement or 2's complement depending on architecture. A 2's complement number is advantageous in that the ALU does not need to design a subtract capability since either a negative value or a positive value in 1's complement requires only and addition within the ALU. Numbers are commonly described in shorthand, where a 12 bit field defines an address of a 4,096 byte block and is commonly described as a 4 Kbyte (Kilo-byte) block for example.

Referring to FIG. 4B, Branch instruction information for executing a branch instruction is typically sent to a branch unit 308 which often employs a branch prediction algorithm such as a branch history table 432 to predict the outcome of the branch before other conditional operations are complete. The target of the current branch instruction will be fetched and speculatively executed before the conditional operations are complete. When the conditional operations are completed the speculatively executed branch instructions are either completed or discarded based on the conditions of the conditional operation and the speculated outcome. A typical branch instruction may test condition codes and branch to a target address if the condition codes meet the branch requirement of the branch instruction, a target address may be calculated based on several numbers including ones found in register fields or an immediate field of the instruction for example. The branch unit 308 may employ an ALU 426 having a plurality of input register circuits 427 428 429 and an output register circuit 430. The branch unit 308 may communicate with general registers 309, decode dispatch unit 306 or other circuits 425 for example.

The execution of a group of instructions can be interrupted for a variety of reasons including a context switch initiated by an operating system, a program exception or error causing a context switch, an I/O interruption signal causing a context switch or multi-threading activity of a plurality of programs (in a multi-threaded environment) for example. Preferably a context switch action saves state information about a currently executing program and then loads state information about another program being invoked. State information may be saved in hardware registers or in memory for example. State information preferably comprises a program counter value pointing to a next instruction to be executed, condition codes, memory translation information and architected register content. A context switch activity can be exercised by hardware circuits, application programs, operating system programs or firmware code (microcode, pico-code or licensed internal code (LIC) alone or in combination.

A processor accesses operands according to instruction defined methods. The instruction may provide an immediate operand using the value of a portion of the instruction, may provide one or more register fields explicitly pointing to either general purpose registers or special purpose registers (floating point registers for example). The instruction may utilize implied registers identified by an opcode field as operands. The instruction may utilize memory locations for operands. A memory location of an operand may be provided by a register, an immediate field, or a combination of registers and immediate field as exemplified by the z/Architecture long displacement facility wherein the instruction defines a Base register, an Index register and an immediate field (displacement field) that are added together to provide the address of the operand in memory for example. Location herein typically implies a location in main memory (main storage) unless otherwise indicated.

Referring to FIG. 4C, a processor accesses storage using a Load/Store unit 310. The Load/Store unit 310 may perform a Load operation by obtaining the address of the target operand in memory 303 and loading the operand in a register 309 or another memory 303 location, or may perform a Store operation by obtaining the address of the target operand in memory 303 and storing data obtained from a register 309 or another memory 303 location in the target operand location in memory 303. The Load/Store unit 310 may be speculative and may access memory in a sequence that is out-of-order relative to instruction sequence, however the Load/Store unit 310 must maintain the appearance to programs that instructions were executed in order. A loadstore unit 310 may communicate with general registers 309, decode/dispatch unit 306, Cache/Memory interface 303 or other elements 455 and comprises various register circuits. ALUs 458 and control logic 463 to calculate storage addresses and to provide pipeline sequencing to keep operations in-order. Some operations may be out of order but the Load/Store unit provides functionality to make the out of order operations to appear to the program as having been performed in order as is well known in the art.

Preferably addresses that an application program “sees” are often referred to as virtual addresses. Virtual addresses are sometimes referred to as “logical addresses” and “effective addresses”. These virtual addresses are virtual in that they are redirected to physical memory location by one of a variety of Dynamic Address Translation (DAT) 312 technologies including, but not limited to simply prefixing a virtual address with an offset value, translating the virtual address via one or more translation tables, the translation tables preferably comprising at least a segment table and a page table alone or in combination, preferably, the segment table having an entry pointing to the page table. In z/Architecture, a hierarchy of translation is provided including a region first table, a region second table, a region third table, a segment table and an optional page table. The performance of the address translation is often improved by utilizing a Translation Look-aside Buffer (TLB) which comprises entries mapping a virtual address to an associated physical memory location. The entries are created when DAT 312 translates a virtual address using the translation tables. Subsequent use of the virtual address can then utilize the entry of the fast TLB rather than the slow sequential Translation table accesses. TLB content may be managed by a variety of replacement algorithms including LRU (Least Recently used).

In the case where the Processor is a processor of a multi-processor system, each processor has responsibility to keep shared resources such as I/O, caches, TLBs and Memory interlocked for coherency. Typically “snoop” technologies will be utilized in maintaining cache coherency. In a snoop environment, each cache line may be marked as being in any one of a shared state, an exclusive state, a changed state, an invalid state and the like in order to facilitate sharing.

I/O units 304 provide the processor with means for attaching to peripheral devices including Tape, Disc, Printers, Displays, and networks for example. I/O units are often presented to the computer program by software Drivers. In Mainframes such as the z/Series from IBM, Channel Adapters and Open System Adapters are I/O units of the Mainframe that provide the communications between the operating system and peripheral devices.

The following description from the z/Architecture Principles of Operation describes an architectural view of a computer system:

Storage:

A computer system includes information in main storage, as well as addressing, protection, and reference and change recording. Some aspects of addressing include the format of addresses, the concept of address spaces, the various types of addresses, and the manner in which one type of address is translated to another type of address. Some of main storage includes permanently assigned storage locations. Main storage provides the system with directly addressable fast-access storage of data. Both data and programs must be loaded into main storage (from input devices) before they can be processed.

Main storage may include one or more smaller, faster-access buffer storages, sometimes called caches. A cache is typically physically associated with a CPU or an I/O processor. The effects, except on performance, of the physical construction and use of distinct storage media are generally not observable by the program.

Separate caches may be maintained for instructions and for data operands. Information within a cache is maintained in contiguous bytes on an integral boundary called a cache block or cache line (or line, for short). A model may provide an EXTRACT CACHE ATTRIBUTE instruction which returns the size of a cache line in bytes. A model may also provide PREFETCH DATA and PREFETCH DATA RELATIVE LONG instructions which effect the prefetching of storage into the data or instruction cache or the releasing of data from the cache.

Storage is viewed as a long horizontal string of bits. For most operations, accesses to storage proceed in a left-to-right sequence. The string of bits is subdivided into units of eight bits. An eight-bit unit is called a byte, which is the basic building block of all information formats. Each byte location in storage is identified by a unique nonnegative integer, which is the address of that byte location or, simply, the byte address. Adjacent byte locations have consecutive addresses, starting with 0 on the left and proceeding in a left-to-right sequence. Addresses are unsigned binary integers and are 24, 31, or 64 bits.

Information is transmitted between storage and a CPU or a channel subsystem one byte, or a group of bytes, at a time. Unless otherwise specified, a group of bytes in storage is addressed by the leftmost byte of the group. The number of bytes in the group is either implied or explicitly specified by the operation to be performed. When used in a CPU operation, a group of bytes is called a field. Within each group of bytes, bits are numbered in a left-to-right sequence. The leftmost bits are sometimes referred to as the “high-order” bits and the rightmost bits as the “low-order” bits. Bit numbers are not storage addresses, however. Only bytes can be addressed. To operate on individual bits of a byte in storage, it is necessary to access the entire byte. The bits in a byte are numbered 0 through 7, from left to right. The bits in an address may be numbered 8-31 or 40-63 for 24-bit addresses or 1-31 or 33-63 for 31-bit addresses; they are numbered 0-63 for 64-bit addresses. Within any other fixed-length format of multiple bytes, the bits making up the format are consecutively numbered starting from 0. For purposes of error detection, and in preferably for correction, one or more check bits may be transmitted with each byte or with a group of bytes. Such check bits are generated automatically by the machine and cannot be directly controlled by the program. Storage capacities are expressed in number of bytes. When the length of a storage-operand field is implied by the operation code of an instruction, the field is said to have a fixed length, which can be one, two, four, eight, or sixteen bytes. Larger fields may be implied for some instructions. When the length of a storage-operand field is not implied but is stated explicitly, the field is said to have a variable length. Variable-length operands can vary in length by increments of one byte. When information is placed in storage, the contents of only those byte locations are replaced that are included in the designated field, even though the width of the physical path to storage may be greater than the length of the field being stored.

Certain units of information must be on an integral boundary in storage. A boundary is called integral for a unit of information when its storage address is a multiple of the length of the unit in bytes. Special names are given to fields of 2, 4, 8, and 16 bytes on an integral boundary. A halfword is a group of two consecutive bytes on a two-byte boundary and is the basic building block of instructions. A word is a group of four consecutive bytes on a four-byte boundary. A doubleword is a group of eight consecutive bytes on an eight-byte boundary. A quadword is a group of 16 consecutive bytes on a 16-byte boundary. When storage addresses designate halfwords, words, doublewords, and quadwords, the binary representation of the address contains one, two, three, or four rightmost zero bits, respectively. Instructions must be on two-byte integral boundaries. The storage operands of most instructions do not have boundary-alignment requirements.

On models that implement separate caches for instructions and data operands, a significant delay may be experienced if the program stores into a cache line from which instructions are subsequently fetched, regardless of whether the store alters the instructions that are subsequently fetched.

Instructions:

Typically, operation of the CPU is controlled by instructions in storage that are executed sequentially, one at a time, left to right in an ascending sequence of storage addresses. A change in the sequential operation may be caused by branching, LOAD PSW, interruptions, SIGNAL PROCESSOR orders, or manual intervention.

Preferably an instruction comprises two major parts:

An operation code (op code), which specifies the operation to be performed

Optionally, the designation of the operands that participate,

Instruction formats of the z/Architecture are shown in FIGS. 5A-5F. An instruction can simply provide an Opcode 501, or an opcode and a variety of fields including immediate operands or register specifiers for locating operands in registers or in memory. The Opcode can indicate to the hardware that implied resources (operands etc.) are to be used such as one or more specific general purpose registers (GPRs). Operands can be grouped in three classes: operands located in registers, immediate operands, and operands in storage. Operands may be either explicitly or implicitly designated. Register operands can be located in general, floating-point, access, or control registers, with the type of register identified by the op code. The register containing the operand is specified by identifying the register in a four-bit field, called the R field, in the instruction. For some instructions, an operand is located in an implicitly designated register, the register being implied by the op code. Immediate operands are contained within the instruction, and the 8-bit, 16-bit, or 32-bit field containing the immediate operand is called the I field. Operands in storage may have an implied length; be specified by a bit mask; be specified by a four-bit or eight-bit length specification, called the L field, in the instruction; or have a length specified by the contents of a general register. The addresses of operands in storage are specified by means of a format that uses the contents of a general register as part of the address. This makes it possible to:

1. Specify a complete address by using an abbreviated notation 2. Perform address manipulation using instructions which employ general registers for operands 3. Modify addresses by program means without alteration of the instruction stream 4. Operate independent of the location of data areas by directly using addresses received from other programs

The address used to refer to storage either is contained in a register designated by the R field in the instruction or is calculated from a base address, index, and displacement, specified by the B, X, and D fields, respectively, in the instruction. When the CPU is in the access-register mode, a B or R field may designate an access register in addition to being used to specify an address. To describe the execution of instructions, operands are preferably designated as first and second operands and, in some cases, third and fourth operands. In general, two operands participate in an instruction execution, and the result replaces the first operand.

An instruction is one, two, or three halfwords in length and must be located in storage on a haifword boundary. Referring to FIGS. 5A-5F depicting instruction formats, each instruction is in one of 25 basic formats: E 501 I 502, RI 503 504, RIE 505 551 552 553 554, RIL 506 507, RIS 555, RR 510, RRE 511, RRF 512 513 514, RRS, RS 516 517, RSI 520, RSL 521, RSY 522 523, RX 524, RXE 525, RXF 526, RXY 527, S 530, SI 531, SIL 556, SIY 532, SS 533 534 535 536 537, SSE 541 and SSF 542, with three variations of RRF, two of RI, RIL, RS, and RSY, five of RIE and SS,

The format names indicate, in general terms, the classes of operands which participate in the operation and some details about fields:

RIS denotes a register-and-immediate operation and a storage operation.

RRS denotes a register-and-register operation and a storage operation.

SIL denotes a storage-and-immediate operation, with a 16-bit immediate field.

In the I, RR, RS, RSI, RX, SI, and SS formats, the first byte of an instruction contains the op code. In the E, RRE, RRF, S, SIL, and SSE formats, the first two bytes of an instruction contain the op code, except that for some instructions in the S format, the op code is in only the first byte. In the RI and RIL formats, the op code is in the first byte and bit positions 12-15 of an instruction. In the RIE, RIS, RRS, RSL, RSY, RXE, RXF, RXY, and STY formats, the op code is in the first byte and the sixth byte of an instruction. The first two bits of the first or only byte of the op code specify the length and format of the instruction, as follows:

In the RR, RRE, RRF, RRR, RX, RXE, RXF, RXY, RS, RSY. RSI, RI, RIE, and RIL formats, the contents of the register designated by the R1 field are called the first operand. The register containing the first operand is sometimes referred to as the “first operand location,” and sometimes as “register R1”. In the RR, RRE, RRF and RRR formats, the R2 field designates the register containing the second operand, and the R2 field may designate the same register as R1. In the RRF, RX F, RS, RSY, RSI, and RIE formats, the use of the R3 field depends on the instruction. In the RS and RSY formats, the R3 field may instead be an M3 field specifying a mask. The R field designates a general or access register in the general instructions, a general register in the control instructions, and a floating-point register or a general register in the floating-point instructions. For general and control registers, the register operand is in bit positions 32-63 of the 64-bit register or occupies the entire register, depending on the instruction.

In the I format, the contents of the eight-bit immediate-data field, the I field of the instruction, are directly used as the operand. In the Si format, the contents of the eight-bit immediate-data field, the I2 field of the instruction, are used directly as the second operand. The B1 and D1 fields specify the first operand, which is one byte in length. In the SIY format, the operation is the same except that DH1 and DL1 fields are used instead of a D1 field. In the R1 format for the instructions ADD HALFWORD IMMEDIATE, COMPARE HALFWORD IMMEDIATE, LOAD HALFWORD IMMEDIATE, and MULTIPLY HALFWORD IMMEDIATE, the contents of the 16-bit I2 field of the instruction are used directly as a signed binary integer, and the R1 field specifies the first operand, which is 32 or 64 bits in length, depending on the instruction. For the instruction TEST UNDER MASK (TMHH, TMHL, TMLH, TMLL), the contents of the I2 field are used as a mask, and the R1 field specifies the first operand, which is 64 bits in length.

For the instructions INSERT IMMEDIATE, AND IMMEDIATE, OR IMMEDIATE, and LOAD LOGICAL IMMEDIATE, the contents of the I2 field are used as an unsigned binary integer or a logical value, and the R1 field specifies the first operand, which is 64 bits in length. For the relative-branch instructions in the RI and RSI formats, the contents of the 16-bit I2 field are used as a signed binary integer designating a number of halfwords. This number, when added to the address of the branch instruction, specifies the branch address. For relative-branch instructions in the RIL format, the I2 field is 32 bits and is used in the same way.

For the relative-branch instructions in the RI and RSI formats, the contents of the 16-bit I2 field are used as a signed binary integer designating a number of halfwords. This number, when added to the address of the branch instruction, specifies the branch address. For relative-branch instructions in the RIL format, the I2 field is 32 bits and is used in the same way. For the RIE-format instructions COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE and COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, the contents of the 8-bit I2 field is used directly as the second operand. For the RIE-format instructions COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH. COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND TRAP, COMPARE LOGICAL IMM DIATE AND BRANCH, and COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND TRAP, the contents of the 16-bit I2 field are used directly as the second operand. For the RIE-format instructions COMPARE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, COMPARE LOGICAL AND BRANCH RELATIVE, and COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, the contents of the 16-bit I4 field are used as a signed binary integer designating a number of halfwords that are added to the address of the instruction to form the branch address.

For the RIL-format instructions ADD IMMEDIATE, ADD LOGICAL IMMEDIATE. ADD LOGICAL WITH SIGNED IMMEDIATE, COMPARE IMMEDIATE, COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE, LOAD IMMEDIATE, and MULTIPLY SINGLE IMMEDIATE, the contents of the 32-bit I2 field are used directly as a the second operand.

For the RIS-format instructions, the contents of the 8-bit I2 field are used directly as the second operand. In the SIL format, the contents of the 16-bit I2 field are used directly as the second operand. The B1 and D1 fields specify the first operand, as described below.

In the RSL, SI, SIL, SSE, and most SS formats, the contents of the general register designated by the B1 field are added to the contents of the D1 field to form the first-operand address. In the RS. RSY, S, SIY. SS, and SSE formats, the contents of the general register designated by the B2 field are added to the contents of the D2 field or DH2 and DL2 fields to form the second-operand address. In the RX, RXE, RXF, and RXY formats, the contents of the general registers designated by the X2 and B2 fields are added to the contents of the D2 field or DH2 and DL2 fields to form the second-operand address. In the RIS and RRS formats, and in one SS format, the contents of the general register designated by the B4 field are added to the contents of the D4 field to form the fourth-operand address.

In the SS format with a single, eight-bit length field, for the instructions AND (NC), EXCLUSIVE OR (XC), MOVE (MVC), MOVE NUMERICS, MOVE ZONES, and OR (OC), L specifies the number of additional operand bytes to the right of the byte designated by the first-operand address. Therefore, the length in bytes of the first operand is 1-256, corresponding to a length code in L of 0-255. Storage results replace the first operand and are never stored outside the field specified by the address and length. In this format, the second operand has the same length as the first operand. There are variations of the preceding definition that apply to EDIT, EDIT AND MARK, PACK ASCII, PACK UNICODE, TRANSLATE, TRANSLATE AND TEST, UNPACK ASCII, and UNPACK UNICODE.

In the SS format with two length fields, and in the RSL format. L1 specifies the number of additional operand bytes to the right of the byte designated by the first-operand address. Therefore, the length in bytes of the first operand is 1-16, corresponding to a length code in L1 of 0-15. Similarly, L2 specifies the number of additional operand bytes to the right of the location designated by the second-operand address Results replace the first operand and are never stored outside the field specified by the address and length. If the first operand is longer than the second, the second operand is extended on the left with zeros up to the length of the first operand. This extension does not modify the second operand in storage. In the SS format with two R fields, as used by the MOVE TO PRIMARY, MOVE TO SECONDARY, and MOVE WITH KEY instructions, the contents of the general register specified by the R1 field are a 32-bit unsigned value called the true length. The operands are both of a length called the effective length. The effective length is equal to the true length or 256, whichever is less. The instructions set the condition code to facilitate programming a loop to move the total number of bytes specified by the true length. The SS format with two R fields is also used to specify a range of registers and two storage operands for the LOAD MULTIPLE DISJOINT instruction and to specify one or two registers and one or two storage operands for the PERFORM LOCKED OPERATION instruction.

A zero in any of the B1, B2, X2, or B4 fields indicates the absence of the corresponding address component. For the absent component, a zero is used informing the intermediate sum, regardless of the contents of general register 0. A displacement of zero has no special significance.

Bits 31 and 32 of the current PSW are the addressing-mode bits, Bit 31 is the extended-addressing mode bit, and bit 32 is the basic-addressing-mode bit. These bits control the size of the effective address produced by address generation. When bits 31 and 32 of the current PSW both are zeros, the CPU is in the 24-bit addressing mode, and 24-bit instruction and operand effective addresses are generated. When bit 31 of the current PSW is zero and bit 32 is one, the CPU is in the 31-bit addressing mode, and 31-bit instruction and operand effective addresses are generated. When bits 31 and 32 of the current PSW are both one, the CPU is in the 64-bit addressing mode, and 64-bit instruction and operand effective addresses are generated. Execution of instructions by the CPU involves generation of the addresses of instructions and operands.

When an instruction is fetched from the location designated by the current PSW, the instruction address is increased by the number of bytes in the instruction, and the instruction is executed. The same steps are then repeated by using the new value of the instruction address to fetch the next instruction in the sequence. In the 24-bit addressing mode, instruction addresses wrap around, with the halfword at instruction address 2²⁴−2 being followed by the halfword at instruction address 0. Thus, in the 24-bit addressing mode, any carry out of PSW bit position 104, as a result of updating the instruction address, is lost. In the 31-bit or 64-bit addressing mode, instruction addresses similarly wrap around, with the halfword at instruction address 2³¹−2 or 2⁶⁴−2, respectively, followed by the halfword at instruction address 0. A carry out of PSW bit position 97 or 64, respectively, is lost.

An operand address that refers to storage is derived from an intermediate value, which either is contained in a register designated by an R field in the instruction or is calculated from the sum of three binary numbers: base address, index, and displacement. The base address (B) is a 64-bit number contained in a general register specified by the program in a four bit field, called the B field, in the instruction. Base addresses can be used as a means of independently addressing each program and data area. In array type calculations, it can designate the location of an array, and, in record-type processing, it can identify the record. The base address provides for addressing the entire storage. The base address may also be used for indexing,

The index (X) is a 64-bit number contained in a general register designated by the program in a four-bit field, called the X field, in the instruction. It is included only in the address specified by the RX-, RXE-, and RXY-format instructions. The RX-, RXE-, RXF-, and RXY-format instructions permit double indexing; that is, the index can be used to provide the address of an element within an array.

The displacement (D) is a 12-bit or 20-bit number contained in a field, called the D field, in the instruction. A 12-bit displacement is unsigned and provides for relative addressing of up to 4,095 bytes beyond the location designated by the base address. A 20-bit displacement is signed and provides for relative addressing of up to 524,287 bytes beyond the base address location or of up to 524,288 bytes before it. In array-type calculations, the displacement can be used to specify one of many items associated with an element. In the processing of records, the displacement can be used to identify items within a record. A 12-bit displacement is in bit positions 20-31 of instructions of certain formats. In instructions of some formats, a second 12-bit displacement also is in the instruction, in bit positions 36-47.

A 20-bit displacement is in instructions of only the RSY, RXY, or SIY format. In these instructions, the D field consists of a DL (low) field in bit positions 20-31 and of a DH (high) field in bit positions 32-39. When the long-displacement facility is installed, the numeric value of the displacement is formed by appending the contents of the DH field on the left of the contents of the DL field. When the long-displacement facility is not installed, the numeric value of the displacement is formed by appending eight zero bits on the left of the contents of the DL field, and the contents of the DH field are ignored.

In forming the intermediate sum, the base address and index are treated as 64-bit binary integers. A 12-bit displacement is treated as a 12-bit unsigned binary integer, and 52 zero bits are appended on the left. A 20-bit displacement is treated as a 20-bit signed binary integer, and 44 bits equal to the sign bit are appended on the left. The three are added as 64-bit binary numbers, ignoring overflow. The sum is always 64 bits long and is used as an intermediate value to form the generated address. The bits of the intermediate value are numbered 0-63. A zero in any of the B1, B2, X2, or B4 fields indicates the absence of the corresponding address component. For the absent component, a zero is used in forming the intermediate sum, regardless of the contents of general register 0. A displacement of zero has no special significance.

When an instruction description specifies that the contents of a general register designated by an R field are used to address an operand in storage, the register contents are used as the 64-bit intermediate value.

An instruction can designate the same general register both for address computation and as the location of an operand. Address computation is completed before registers, if any, are changed by the operation. Unless otherwise indicated in an individual instruction definition, the generated operand address designates the leftmost byte of an operand in storage.

The generated operand address is always 64 bits long, and the bits are numbered 0-63. The manner in which the generated address is obtained from the intermediate value depends on the current addressing mode. In the 24-bit addressing mode, bits 0-39 of the intermediate value are ignored, bits 0-39 of the generated address are forced to be zeros, and bits 40-63 of the intermediate value become bits 40-63 of the generated address. In the 31-bit addressing mode, bits 0-32 of the intermediate value are ignored, bits 0-32 of the generated address are forced to be zero, and bits 33-63 of the intermediate value become bits 33-63 of the generated address. In the 64-bit addressing mode, bits 0-63 of the intermediate value become bits 0-63 of the generated address. Negative values may be used in index and base-address registers. Bits 0-32 of these values are ignored in the 31-bit addressing mode, and bits 0-39 are ignored in the 24-bit addressing mode.

For branch instructions, the address of the next instruction to be executed when the branch is taken is called the branch address. Depending on the branch instruction, the instruction format may be RR, RRE, RX, RXY, RS, RSY, RSI, RI, RIE, or RIL. In the RS, RSY, RX, and RXY formats, the branch address is specified by a base address, a displacement, and, in the RX and RXY formats, an index. In these formats, the generation of the intermediate value follows the same rules as for the generation of the operand-address intermediate value. In the RR and RRE formats, the contents of the general register designated by the R2 field are used as the intermediate value from which the branch address is formed. General register 0 cannot be designated as containing a branch address. A value of zero in the R2 field causes the instruction to be executed without branching.

The relative-branch instructions are in the RSI, RI, RIE, and RIL formats. In the RSI, RI, and RIE formats for the relative-branch instructions, the contents of the I2 field are treated as a 16-bit signed binary integer designating a number of halfwords. In the RIL format, the contents of the I2 field are treated as a 32-hit signed binary integer designating a number of halfwords. The branch address is the number of halfwords designated by the I2 field added to the address of the relative-branch instruction.

The 64-bit intermediate value for a relative branch instruction in the RSI, RI, RIE, or RIL format is the sum of two addends, with overflow from bit position 0 ignored. In the RSI, RI, or RIE format, the first addend is the contents of the I2 field with one zero bit appended on the right and 47 bits equal to the sign bit of the contents appended on the left, except that for COMPARE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE, COMPARE LOGICAL AND BRANCH RELATIVE and COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND I BRA NCH RELATIVE, the first addend is the contents of the I4 field, with bits appended as described above for the I2 field. In the RIL format, the first addend is the contents of the I2 field with one zero bit appended on the right and 31 bits equal to the sign bit of the contents appended on the left. In all formats, the second addend is the 64-bit address of the branch instruction. The address of the branch instruction is the instruction address in the PSW before that address is updated to address the next sequential instruction, or it is the address of the target of the EXECUTIE instruction if EXECUTE is used. If EXECUTE is used in the 24-bit or 31-bit addressing mode, the address of the branch instruction is the target address with 40 or 33 zeros, respectively, appended on the left.

The branch address is always 64 bits long, with the bits numbered 0-63. The branch address replaces bits 64-127 of the current PSW. The manner in which the branch address is obtained from the intermediate value depends on the addressing mode. For those branch instructions which change the addressing mode, the new addressing mode is used. In the 24-bit addressing mode, bits 0-39 of the intermediate value are ignored, bits 0-39 of the branch address are made zeros, and bits 40-63 of the intermediate value become bits 40-63 of the branch address. In the 31-bit addressing mode, bits 0-32 of the intermediate value are ignored, bits 0-32 of the branch address are made zeros, and bits 33-63 of the intermediate value become bits 33-63 of the branch address. In the 64-bit addressing mode, bits 0-63 of the intermediate value become bits 0-63 of the branch address.

For several branch instructions, branching depends on satisfying a specified condition. When the condition is not satisfied, the branch is not taken, normal sequential instruction execution continues, and the branch address is not used. When a branch is taken, bits 0-63 of the branch address replace bits 64-127 of the current PSW. The branch address is not used to access storage as part of the branch operation. A specification exception due to an odd branch address and access exceptions due to fetching of the instruction at the branch location are not recognized as part of the branch operation but instead are recognized as exceptions associated with the execution of the instruction at the branch location.

A branch instruction, such as BRANCH AND SAVE, can designate the same general register for branch address computation and as the location of an operand. Branch-address computation is completed before the remainder of the operation is performed,

The program-status word (PSW), described in Chapter 4 “Control” contains information required for proper program execution. The PSW is used to control instruction sequencing and to hold and indicate the status of the CPU in relation to the program currently being executed. The active or controlling PSW is called the current PSW. Branch instructions perform the functions of decision making, loop control, and subroutine linkage. A branch instruction affects instruction sequencing by introducing a new instruction address into the current PSW. The relative-branch instructions with a 16-bit I2 field allow branching to a location at an offset of up to plus 64K−2 bytes or minus 64K bytes relative to the location of the branch instruction, without the use of a base register. The relative-branch instructions with a 32-bit I2 field allow branching to a location at an offset of up to plus 4G−2 bytes or minus 4G bytes relative to the location of the branch instruction, without the use of a base register.

Facilities for decision making are provided by the BRANCH ON CONDITION, BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION, and BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION LONG instructions. These instructions inspect a condition code that reflects the result of a majority of the arithmetic, logical, and I/O operations. The condition code, which consists of two bits, provides for four possible condition-code settings: 0, 1, 2, and 3.

The specific meaning of any setting depends on the operation that sets the condition code. For example, the condition code reflects such conditions as zero, nonzero, first operand high, equal, overflow, and subchannel busy. Once set, the condition code remains unchanged until modified by an instruction that causes a different condition code to be set.

Loop control can be performed by the use of BRANCH ON CONDITION, BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION, and BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION LONG to test the outcome of address arithmetic and counting operations. For some particularly frequent combinations of arithmetic and tests. BRANCH ON COUNT, BRANCH ON INDEX HIGH, and BRANCH ON INDEX LOW OR EQUAL are provided, and relative-branch equivalents of these instructions are also provided. These branches, being specialized, provide increased performance for these tasks.

Subroutine linkage when a change of the addressing mode is not required is provided by the BRANCH AND LINK and BRANCH AND SAVE instructions. (This discussion of BRANCH AND SAVE applies also to BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE and BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE LONG.) Both of these instructions permit not only the introduction of a new instruction address but also the preservation of a return address and associated information. The return address is the address of the instruction following the branch instruction in storage, except that it is the address of the instruction following an EXECUTE instruction that has the branch instruction as its target.

Both BRANCH AND LINK and BRANCH AND SAVE have an R1 field. They form a branch address by means of fields that depend on the instruction. The operations of the instructions are summarized as follows:

-   -   In the 24-bit addressing mode, both instructions place the         return address in bit positions 40-63 of general register R1 and         leave bits 0-31 of that register unchanged. BRANCH AND LINK         places the instruction-length code for the instruction and also         the condition code and program mask from the current PSW in bit         positions 32-39 of general register R1 BRANCH AND SAVE places         zeros in those bit positions.     -   In the 31-bit addressing mode, both instructions place the         return address in bit positions 33-63 and a one in bit position         32 of general register R1, and they leave bits 0-31 of the         register unchanged.

In the 64-bit addressing mode, both instructions place the return address in bit positions 0-63 of general register R1.

In any addressing mode, both instructions generate the branch address under the control of the current addressing mode. The instructions place bits 0-63 of the branch address in bit positions 64-127 of the PSW. In the RR format, both instructions do not perform branching if the R2 field of the instruction is zero.

It can be seen that, in the 24-bit or 31-bit addressing mode, BRANCH AND SAVE places the basic addressing-mode bit, bit 32 of the PSW, in bit position 32 of general register R1. BRANCH AND LINK does so in the 31-bit addressing mode. The instructions BRANCH AND SAVE AND SET MODE and BRANCH AND SET MODE are for use when a change of the addressing mode is required during linkage. These instructions have R1 and R2 fields. The operations of the instructions are summarized as follows:

BRANCH AND SAVE AND SET MODE sets the contents of general register R1 the same as BRANCH AND SAVE. In addition, the instruction places the extended-addressing-mode bit, bit 31 of the PSW, in bit position 63 of the register.

BRANCH AND SET MODE, if R1 is nonzero, performs as follows. In the 24- or 31-bit mode, it places bit 32 of the PSW in bit position 32 of general register R1, and it leaves bits 0-31 and 33-63 of the register unchanged. Note that bit 63 of the register should be zero if the register contains an instruction address. In the 64-bit mode, the instruction places bit 31 of the PSW (a one) in bit position 63 of general register R1, and it leaves bits 0-62 of the register unchanged.

When R2 is nonzero, both instructions set the addressing mode and perform branching as follows. Bit 63 of general register R2 is placed in bit position 31 of the PSW. If bit 63 is zero, bit 32 of the register is placed in bit position 32 of the PSW. If bit 63 is one, PSW bit 32 is set to one. Then the branch address is generated from the contents of the register, except with bit 63 of the register treated as a zero, under the control of the new addressing mode. The instructions place bits 0-63 of the branch address in bit positions 64-127 of the PSW. Bit 63 of general register R2 remains unchanged and, therefore, may be one upon entry to the called program. If R2 is the same as R1, the results in the designated general register are as specified for the R1 register.

Interruptions (Context Switch):

The interruption mechanism permits the CPU to change its state as a result of conditions external to the configuration, within the configuration, or within the CPU itself. To permit fast response to conditions of high priority and immediate recognition of the type of condition, interruption conditions are grouped into six classes: external, input/output, machine check, program, restart, and supervisor call,

An interruption consists in storing the current PSW as an old PSW, storing information identifying the cause of the interruption, and fetching a new PSW. Processing resumes as specified by the new PSW. The old PSW stored on an interruption normally contains the address of the instruction that would have been executed next had the interruption not occurred, thus permitting resumption of the interrupted program. For program and supervisor-call interruptions, the information stored also contains a code that identifies the length of the last-executed instruction, thus permitting the program to respond to the cause of the interruption. In the case of some program conditions for which the normal response is re-execution of the instruction causing the interruption, the instruction address directly identifies the instruction last executed.

Except for restart, an interruption can occur only when the CPU is in the operating state. The restart interruption can occur with the CPU) in either the stopped or operating state.

Any access exception is recognized as part of the execution of the instruction with which the exception is associated. An access exception is not recognized when the CPU attempts to prefetch from an unavailable location or detects some other access-exception condition, but a branch instruction or an interruption changes the instruction sequence such that the instruction is not executed. Every instruction can cause an access exception to be recognized because of instruction fetch. Additionally, access exceptions associated with instruction execution may occur because of an access to an operand in storage. An access exception due to fetching an instruction is indicated when the first instruction halfword cannot be fetched without encountering the exception. When the first halfword of the instruction has no access exceptions, access exceptions may be indicated for additional halfwords according to the instruction length specified by the first two bits of the instruction; however, when the operation can be performed without accessing the second or third halfwords of the instruction, it is unpredictable whether the access exception is indicated for the unused part. Since the indication of access exceptions for instruction fetch is common to all instructions, it is not covered in the individual instruction definitions.

Except where otherwise indicated in the individual instruction description, the following rules apply for exceptions associated with an access to an operand location. For a fetch-type operand, access exceptions are necessarily indicated only for that portion of the operand which is required for completing the operation. It is unpredictable whether access exceptions are indicated for those portions of a fetch-type operand which are not required for completing the operation,

For a store-type operand, access exceptions are recognized for the entire operand even if the operation could be completed without the use of the inaccessible part of the operand. In situations where the value of a store-type operand is defined to be unpredictable, it is unpredictable whether an access exception is indicated. Whenever an access to an operand location can cause an access exception to be recognized, the word “access” is included in the list of program exceptions in the description of the instruction. This entry also indicates which operand can cause the exception to be recognized and whether the exception is recognized on a fetch or store access to that operand location. Access exceptions are recognized only for the portion of the operand as defined for each particular instruction.

An operation exception is recognized when the CPU attempts to execute an instruction with an invalid operation code. The operation code may be unassigned, or the instruction with that operation code may not be installed on the CPU. The operation is suppressed. The instruction-length code is 1, 2, or 3. The operation exception is indicated by a program interruption code of 0001 hex (or 0081 hex if a concurrent PER event is indicated).

Some models may offer instructions not described in this publication, such as those provided for assists or as part of special or custom features. Consequently, operation codes not described in this publication do not necessarily cause an operation exception to be recognized. Furthermore, these instructions may cause modes of operation to be set up or may otherwise alter the machine so as to affect the execution of subsequent instructions. To avoid causing such an operation, an instruction with an operation code not described in this publication should be executed only when the specific function associated with the operation code is desired.

A specification exception is recognized when any of the following is true:

1. A one is introduced into an unassigned bit position of the PSW (that is, any of bit positions 0, 2-4, 24-30, or 33-63). This is handled as an early PSW specification exception. 2. A one is introduced into bit position 12 of the PSW. This is handled as an early PSW specification exception. 3. The PSW is invalid in any of the following ways: a. Bit 31 of the PSW is one and bit 32 is zero. b. Bits 31 and 32 of the PSW are zero, indicating the 24-bit addressing mode, and bits 64-103 of the PSW are not all zeros, c. Bit 31 of the PSW is zero and bit 32 is one, indicating the 31-bit addressing mode, and bits 64-96 of the PSW are not all zeros. This is handled as an early PSW specification exception. 4. The PSW contains an odd instruction address. 5. An operand address does not designate an integral boundary in an instruction requiring such integral-boundary designation. 6. An odd-numbered general register is designated by an R field of an instruction that requires an even-numbered register designation. 7. A floating-point register other than 0, 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, or 13 is designated for an extended operand. 8. The rnuliplier or divisor in decimal arithmetic exceeds 15 digits and sign. 9. The length of the first-operand field is less than or equal to the length of the second-operand field in decimal multiplication or division. 10. Execution of CIPHER MESSAGE, CIPHER MESSAGE WITH CHAINING, COMPUTE INTERMEDIATE MESSAGE DIGEST, COMPUTE LAST MESSAGE DIGEST, or COMPUTE MESSAGE AUTHENTICATION CODE is attempted, and the function code in bits 57-63 of general register 0 contain an unassigned or uninstalled function code. 11. Execution of CIPHER MESSAGE or CIPHER MESSAGE WITH CHAINING is attempted, and the R1 or R2 field designates an odd-numbered register or general register 0.

12. Execution of CIPHER MESSAGE, CIPHER MESSAGE WITH CHAINING, COMPUTE INTERMEDIATE MESSAGE DIGEST or COMPUTE MESSAGE AUTHENTICATION CODE is attempted, and the second operand length is not a multiple of the data block size of the designated function. This specification-exception condition does not apply to the query functions.

13. Execution of COMPARE AND FORM CODEWORD is attempted, and general registers 1, 2, and 3 do not initially contain even values. 32. Execution of COMPARE AND SWAP AND STORE is attempted and any of the following conditions exist:

The function code specifies an unassigned value.

The store characteristic specifies an unassigned value.

The function code is 0, and the first operand is not designated on a word boundary.

The function code is 1, and the first operand is not designated on a doubleword boundary.

The second operand is not designated on an integral boundary corresponding to the size of the store value.

33. Execution of COMPARE LOGICAL LONG UNICODE or MOVE LONG UNICODE is attempted, and the contents of either general register R1+1 or R3+1 do not specify an even number of bytes. 34. Execution of COMPARE LOGICAL STRING. MOVE STRING or SEARCH STRING is attempted, and bits 32-55 of general register 0 are not all zeros. 35. Execution of COMPRESSION CALL is attempted, and bits 48-51 of general register 0 have any of the values 0000 and 0110-1111 binary. 36. Execution of COMPUTE INTERMEDIATE MESSAGE DIGEST. COMPUTE LAST MESSAGE DIGEST, or COMPUTE MESSAGE AUTHENTICATION CODE is attempted, and either of the following is true:

The R2 field designates an odd-numbered register or general register 0.

Bit 56 of general register 0 is not zero.

37. Execution of CONVERT HFP TO BFP, CONVERT TO FIXED (BFP or HFP), or LOAD FP INTEGER (BFP) is attempted, and the M3 field does not designate a valid modifier. 38. Execution of DIVIDE TO INTEGER is attempted, and the M4 field does not designate a valid modifier. 39. Execution of EXECUTE is attempted, and the target address is odd. 40. Execution of EXTRACT STACKED STATE is attempted, and the code in bit positions 56-63 of general register R2 is greater than 4 when the ASN-and-LX-reuse facility is not installed or is greater than 5 when the facility is installed. 41. Execution of FIND LEFTMOST ONE is attempted, and the R1 field designates an odd numbered register. 42. Execution of INVALIDATE DAT TABLE ENTRY is attempted, and bits 44-51 of general register R2 are not all zeros, 43. Execution of LOAD FPC is attempted, and one or more bits of the second operand corresponding to unsupported bits in the FPC register are one. 44. Execution of LOAD PAGE-TABLE-ENTRY ADDRESS is attempted and the M4 field of the instruction contains any value other than 0000-0100 binary. 45. Execution of LOAD PSW is attempted and bit 12 of the doubleword at the second-operand address is zero. It is model dependent whether or not this exception is recognized. 46. Execution of MONITOR CALL is attempted, and bit positions 8-11 of the instruction do not contain zeros. 47. Execution of MOVE PAGE is attempted, and bit positions 48-51 of general register 0 do not contain zeros or bits 52 and 53 of the register are both one. 48. Execution of PACK ASCII is attempted, and the L2 field is greater than 31. 49. Execution of PACK UNICODE is attempted, and the L2 field is greater than 63 or is even. 50. Execution of PERFORM FLOATING POINT OPERATION is attempted, bit 32 of general register 0 is zero, and one or more fields in bits 33-63 are invalid or designate an uninstalled function. 51. Execution of PER FORM LOCKED OPERATION is attempted, and any of the following is true:

The T bit, bit 55 of general register 0 is zero, and the function code in bits 56-63 of the register is invalid.

Bits 32-54 of general register 0 are not all zeros.

In the access-register mode, for function codes that cause use of a parameter list containing an ALET, the R3 field is zero.

52. Execution of PERFORM TIMING FACILITY FUNCTION is attempted, and either of the following is true:

Bit 56 of general register 0 is not zero,

Bits 57-63 of general register 0 specify an unassigned or uninstalled function code.

53. Execution of PROGRAM TRANSFER or PROGRAM TRANSFER WITH INSTANCE is attempted, and all of the following are true:

The extended-addressing-mode bit in the PSW is zero.

The basic-addressing-mode bit, bit 32, in the general register designated by the R2 field of the instruction is zero.

Bits 33-39 of the instruction address in the same register are not all zeros.

54. Execution of RESUME PROGRAM is attempted, and either of the following is true:

Bits 31, 32, and 64-127 of the PSW field in the second operand are not valid for placement in the current PSW. The exception is recognized if any of the following is true:

-   -   Bits 31 and 32 are both zero and bits 64-103 are not all zeros.     -   Bits 31 and 32 are zero and one, respectively, and bits 64-96         are not all zeros.     -   Bits 31 and 32 are one and zero, respectively.     -   Bit 127 is one.

Bits 0-12 of the parameter list are not all zeros.

55. Execution of SEARCH STRING UNICODE is attempted, and bits 32-47 of general register 0 are not all zeros. 56. Execution of SET ADDRESS SPACE CONTROL or SET ADDRESS SPACE CONTROL FAST is attempted, and bits 52 and 53 of the second-operand address are not both zeros. 57. Execution of SET ADDRESSING MODE (SAM24) is attempted, and bits 0-39 of the un-updated instruction address in the PSW, bits 64-103 of the PSW, are not all zeros. 58. Execution of SET ADDRESSING MODE (SAM31) is attempted, and bits 0-32 of the un-updated instruction address in the PSW, bits 64-96 of the PSW, are not all zeros. 59. Execution of SET CLOCK PROGRAMMABLE FIELD is attempted, and bits 32-47 of general register 0 are not all zeros. 60. Execution of SET FPC is attempted, and one or more bits of the first operand corresponding to unsupported bits in the FPC register are one. 61. Execution of STORE SYSTEM INFORMATION is attempted, the function code in general register 0 is valid, and either of the following is true:

Bits 36-55 of general register 0 and bits 32-47 of general register 1 are not all zeros.

The second-operand address is not aligned on a 4K-byte boundary.

62. Execution of TRANSLATE TWO TO ONE or TRANSLATE TWO TO TWO is attempted, and the length in general register R1+1 does not specify an even number of bytes. 63. Execution of UNPACK ASCII is attempted, and the L1 field is greater than 31. 64. Execution of UNPACK UNICODE is attempted, and the L1 field is greater than 63 or is even. 65. Execution of UPDATE TREE is attempted, and the initial contents of general registers 4 and 5 are not a multiple of 8 in the 24-bit or 31-bit addressing mode or are not a multiple of 16 in the 64-bit addressing mode. The execution of the instruction identified by the old PSW is suppressed. However, for early PSW specification exceptions (causes 1-3) the operation that introduces the new PSW is completed, but an interruption occurs immediately thereafter. Preferably, the instruction-length code (ILC) is 1, 2, or 3, indicating the length of the instruction causing the exception. When the instruction address is odd (cause 4 on page 6-33), it is unpredictable whether the ILC is 1, 2, or 3. When the exception is recognized because of an early PSW specification exception (causes 1-3) and the exception has been introduced by LOAD PSW, LOAD PSW EXTENDED, PROGRAM RETURN, or an interruption, the ILC is 0. When the exception is introduced by SET ADDRESSING MODE (SAM24, SAM31), the ILC is 1, or it is 2 if SET ADDRESSING MODE was the target of EXECUTE. When the exception is introduced by SET SYSTEM MASK or by STORE THEN OR SYSTEM MASK, the ILC is 2.

Program interruptions are used to report exceptions and events which occur during execution of the program. A program interruption causes the old PSW to be stored at real locations 336-351 and a new PSW to be fetched from real locations 464-479. The cause of the interruption is identified by the interruption code. The interruption code is placed at real locations 142-143, the instruction-length code is placed in bit positions 5 and 6 of the byte at real location 141 with the rest of the bits set to zeros, and zeros are stored at real location 140. For some causes, additional information identifying the reason for the interruption is stored at real locations 144-183. If the PER-3 facility is installed, then, as part of the program interruption action, the contents of the breaking-event-address register are placed in real storage locations 272-279. Except for PER events and the crypto-operation exception, the condition causing the interruption is indicated by a coded value placed in the rightmost seven bit positions of the interruption code. Only one condition at a time can be indicated. Bits 0-7 of the interruption code are set to zeros. PER events are indicated by setting bit 8 of the interruption code to one. When this is the only condition, bits 0-7 and 9-15 are also set to zeros. When a PER event is indicated concurrently with another program interruption condition, bit 8 is one, and bits 0-7 and 9-15 are set as for the other condition. The crypto-operation exception is indicated by an interruption code of 0119 hex, or 0199 hex if a PER event is also indicated,

When there is a corresponding mask bit, a program interruption can occur only when that mask bit is one. The program mask in the PSW controls four of the exceptions, the IEEE masks in the FPC register control the IEEE exceptions, bit 33 in control register 0 controls whether SET SYSTEM MASK causes a special—operation exception, bits 48-63 in control register 8 control interruptions due to monitor events, and a hierarchy of masks control interruptions due to PER events. When any controlling mask bit is zero, the condition is ignored; the condition does not remain pending.

When the new PSW for a program interruption has a PSW-format error or causes an exception to be recognized in the process of instruction fetching, a string of program interruptions may occur,

Some of the conditions indicated as program exceptions may be recognized also by the channel subsystem, in which case the exception is indicated in the subchannel-status word or extended-status word.

When a data exception causes a program interruption, a data-exception code (DXC) is stored at location 147, and zeros are stored at locations 144-146. The DXC distinguishes between the various types of data-exception conditions. When the AFP-register (additional floating-point register) control bit, bit 45 of control register 0, is one, the DXC is also placed in the DXC field of the floating-point-control (FPC) register. The DXC field in the FPC register remains unchanged when any other program exception is reported. The DXC is an 8-bit code indicating the specific cause of a data exception.

DXC 2 and 3 are mutually exclusive and are of higher priority than any other DXC. Thus, for example, DXC 2 (BFP instruction) takes precedence over any IEEE exception; and DXC 3 (DFP instruction) takes precedence over any IEEE exception or simulated IEEE exception. As another example, if the conditions for both DXC 3 (DFP instruction) and DXC 1 (AFP register) exist, DXC 3 is reported. When both a specification exception and an AFP register data exception apply, it is unpredictable which one is reported.

An addressing exception is recognized when the CPU attempts to reference a main-storage location that is not available in the configuration. A main-storage location is not available in the configuration when the location is not installed, when the storage unit is not in the configuration, or when power is off in the storage unit. An address designating a storage location that is not available in the configuration is referred to as invalid. The operation is suppressed when the address of the instruction is invalid. Similarly, the operation is suppressed when the address of the target instruction of EXECUTE is invalid. Also, the unit of operation is suppressed when an addressing exception is encountered in accessing a table or table entry. The tables and table entries to which the rule applies are the dispatchable-unit-control table, the primary ASN second-table entry, and entries in the access list, region first table, region second table, region third table, segment table, page table, linkage table, linkage-first table, linkage-second table, entry table, ASN first table, ASN second table, authority table, linkage stack, and trace table. Addressing exceptions result in suppression when they are encountered for references to the region first table, region second table, region third table, segment table, and page table, in both implicit references for dynamic address translation and references associated with the execution of LOAD PAGE-TABLE-ENTRY ADDRESS. LOAD REAL ADDRESS, STORE REAL ADDRESS, and TEST PROTECTION. Similarly, addressing exceptions for accesses to the dispatchable-unit control table, primary ASN-second-table entry, access list, ASN second table, or authority table result in suppression when they are encountered in access-register translation done either implicitly or as part of LOAD PAGE-TABLE-ENTRY ADDRESS, LOAD REAL ADDRESS, STORE REAL ADDRESS, TEST ACCESS, or TEST PROTECTION. Except for some specific instructions whose execution is suppressed, the operation is terminated for an operand address that can be translated but designates an unavailable location. For termination, changes may occur only to result fields. In this context, the term “result field” includes the condition code, registers, and any storage locations that are provided and that are designated to be changed by the instruction.

Storage-Operand Fetch References:

When the bytes of a storage operand participate in the instruction execution only as a source, the operand is called a fetch-type operand, and the reference to the location is called a storage-operand fetch reference. A fetch-type operand is identified in individual instruction definitions by indicating that the access exception is for fetch.

All bits within a single byte of a fetch-type operand are accessed concurrently. When an operand consists of more than one byte, the bytes may be fetched from storage piecemeal, one byte at a time. Unless otherwise specified, the bytes are not necessarily fetched in any particular sequence.

The storage-operand fetch references of one instruction occur after those of all preceding instructions and before those of subsequent instructions, as observed by other CPUs and by channel programs. The operands of any one instruction are fetched in the sequence specified for that instruction. The CPU may fetch the operands of instructions before the instructions are executed. There is no defined limit on the length of time between when an operand is fetched and when it is used. Still, as observed by the CPU itself, its storage-operand references are performed in the conceptual sequence.

For certain special instructions, the fetch references for multiple operands may appear to be locked against certain accesses by other CPUs and by channel programs. Such a fetch reference is called an interlocked-fetch reference. The fetch accesses associated with an interlocked-fetch reference do not necessarily occur one immediately after the other, but all store accesses by other CPUs may not occur at the same locations as the interlocked-fetch reference between the fetch accesses of the interlocked fetch reference.

The storage-operand fetch reference for the LOAD PAIR DISJOINT instruction may appear to be an interlocked-fetch reference. Whether or not LOAD PAIR DISJOINT is able to fetch both operands by means of an interlocked fetch is indicated by the condition code.

Storage-Operand Store References:

When the bytes of a storage operand participate in the instruction execution only as a destination, to the extent of being replaced by the result, the operand is called a store-type operand, and the reference to the location is called a storage-operand store reference. A store-type operand is identified in individual instruction definitions by indicating that the access exception is for store.

All bits within a single byte of a store-type operand are accessed concurrently. When an operand consists of more than one byte, the bytes may be placed in storage piecemeal, one byte at a time. Unless otherwise specified, the bytes are not necessarily stored in any particular sequence.

The CPU may delay placing results in storage. There is no defined limit on the length of time that results may remain pending before they are stored. This delay does not affect the sequence in which results are placed in storage.

The results of one instruction are placed in storage after the results of all preceding instructions have been placed in storage and before any results of the succeeding instructions are stored, as observed by other CPUs and by channel programs. The results of any one instruction are stored in the sequence specified for that instruction.

The CPU does not fetch operands, ART-table entries, or DAT-table entries from a storage location until all information destined for that location by the CPU has been stored. Prefetched instructions may appear to be updated before the information appears in storage.

The stores are necessarily completed only as a result of a serializing operation and before the CPU enters the stopped state.

Block-Concurrent References

For some references, the accesses to all bytes within a halfword, word, doubleword, or quadword are specified to appear to be block concurrent as observed by other CPUs and channel programs. The halfword, word, doubleword, or quadword is referred to in this section as a block. When a fetch-type reference is specified to appear to be concurrent within a block, no store access to the block by another CPU or channel program is permitted during the time that bytes contained in the block are being fetched. When a store-type reference is specified to appear to be concurrent within a block, no access to the block, either fetch or store, is permitted by another CPU or channel program during the time that the bytes within the block are being stored.

CPU Serialization:

In the following discussion, the term serializing instruction refers to an instruction which causes one or more serialization functions to be performed. The term serializing operation refers to a unit of operation within an instruction or to a machine operation such as an interruption which causes a serialization function is performed.

The sequence of events associated with a serializing operation is as follows:

1. All conceptually previous storage accesses by the CPU are completed as observed by other CPUs and by channel programs. This includes all conceptually previous stores and changes to the storage keys.

2. The normal function associated with the serializing operation is performed. In the case of instruction execution, operands are fetched, and the storing of results is completed. The exceptions are LOAD PSW, LOAD PSW EXTENDED, and SET PREFIX, in which the operand may be fetched before previous stores have been completed, and interruptions, in which the interruption code and associated fields may be stored prior to the serialization. The fetching of the serializing instruction occurs before the execution of the instruction and may precede the execution of previous instructions, but may not precede the completion of any previous serializing operation. In the case of an interruption, the old PSW, the interruption code, and other information, if any, are stored, and the new PSW is fetched, but not necessarily in that sequence.

3. Finally, instruction fetch and operand accesses for conceptually subsequent operations may begin.

A serializing function affects the sequence of storage accesses that are under the control of the CPU in which the serializing function takes place. It does not affect the sequence of storage accesses under the control of other CPUs and of channel programs.

Specific-Operand Serialization

Certain instructions cause specific-operand serialization to be performed for an operand of the instruction. As observed by other CPUs and by the channel subsystem, a specific-operand-serialization operation consists in completing all conceptually previous storage accesses by the CPU before conceptually subsequent accesses to the specific storage operand of the instruction may occur. At the completion of an instruction causing specific-operand serialization, the instruction's store is completed as observed by other CPUs and channel programs.

Interlocking Instruction Execution

When an instruction executes, particularly in a multi-processor system wherein an instruction, may access resources that are shared with other processors, a program needs to interlock the resource availability to other processors to prevent the other processors from accessing the resource while the instruction is being execute. Otherwise, unpredictable results may be had. Some architectures provide instruction functionality where the resources are interlocked during a critical part of the instruction execution. Resources that are exposed to perturbation by shared processors include memory and memory caches in most multiprocessors. Other resources of processors that may be shared are known and are specified by corresponding architecture documents. Some instruction execution functionality that is exposed to not interlocking resources are, for example, Storage Operand Fetch references, Storage Operand Store references, Block Concurrent References, CPU serialization and Specific Operand Serialization already described.

The present invention provides an architecture, wherein interlocking is not required for certain instructions by permitting an implementation dependent determination of whether the instruction was exposed to possible resource interference and setting an indicator to indicate that the instruction either completed without any possibility of having an intervening resource operation that may have effected the architected operation of the instruction or was exposed to an intervening resource operation. Thus, a program could be written, such that a test of the indicator is made after execution such instructions to determine if the result was affected by interference from another processor. If the test failed, a recovery routine would be invoked. In one embodiment, the indicator could be a condition code and the test could be testing the condition code and branching back to re-execute the affected instruction.

Load Pair Disjoint Facility:

Multi-threaded programming languages like Java require synchronization of data structures and objects to ensure correctness and consistency of state across application threads. One typical mechanism for enforcing such consistency is to embed a lock word in data structures or objects that are shared between threads. Threads can then use atomic update instructions like compare-and-swap to synchronize ownership of the data structure. For example, when considering object O here:

Object O {  intptr_t lock_id;  field a;  field b;  field c;  ...  }; lock_id holds a NULL value when unlocked. If a given thread wishes to read or write to object O it must successfully compare-and-swap (CAS) its thread_id into lock_id—thus claiming ownership of the object. For example:

Rtid = thread_id; Rnull = 0; // Attempt to atomically update lock_id if it is NULL with Rtid // if ( CAS Rtid, Rnull, (O.lock_id) )  {  // Compare-and-swap successful: object was successfully locked  //  read O.a;  O.lock_id = NULL;  } else  {  // Compare-and-swap failed:  // Object not successfully locked, do something else  // or wait a bit and try again  //  }

On some computer architectures, using compare-and-swap requires exclusive ownership of the underlying cache-line that holds lock_id. Obtaining exclusive ownership of a cache-line can be very costly as it requires invalidation of the cache-line on other processors and/or a re-fetch of the cache-line on the owning processor. This can have the effect of increasing windows of contention, which in essence could exacerbate contention on a lock that would not be contented if the lock operation was timelier. Note that a second store to the lock_id is also typically required to release the object by NULLing the lock_id. This could effectively require re-gaining exclusive access to the lock_id's cache-line.

Hence, in situations where synchronization is used for reading a field off a synchronized data structure it is particularly costly to have to write to the lock_id cache-line when the actual synchronized read of the object's field does not require any form of exclusive access. The present invention provides a new hardware facility for loading a pair of disjoint memory locations (Load-Disjoint-Pair instruction) atomically is needed.

Load-Pair-Disjoint Operation

The present invention teaches a new hardware facility called load-disjoint-pair (LPD). This facility is used to atomically read a pair of disjoint memory elements. This provides a mechanism for guaranteeing that the two elements were consistent, or, more precisely, that there were no intervening updates to the two disjoint memory locations when they were loaded. For example:

// Attempt to load O.lock_id and O.a consistently // LPD lock=(O.lock_id), f=(O.a); if (lock==0)  {  // Object was not locked, field was successfully loaded  } else  {  // Object was locked, do something else or re-try  }

Note that the lock_id will not be stored to when doing a synchronized load of field a out of object O, hence cache-lines should not need to be held exclusively. Alternative implementations of the LPD facility could be less strict in enforcing atomicity. For example, LPD could provide feedback to the user on whether or not the pair of loads was consistent through the use of a condition code. Other additional implementations could provide condition code settings to indicate if one of the operands was NULL or not when loaded. For example:

// Attempt to load O.lock_id and O.a consistently // cond_code =lock=(O.1ock_id), f=(O.a); if ( (cond_code&LPD_SUCCESSFUL_FLAG)==0 && (cond_code&LPD_NULLOP)==1)  {  // LPD was successful, and O.lock_id was NULL  //  } else  {  // LPD failed or object was locked, do something else or re-try  }

Preferably (FIG. 9), a program may be executed 901 including one or more Load/Store Disjoint (LSD) instructions that, when executed 903, based in the LSD instruction opcode, would attempt to either load or store data to/from memory atomically and set a condition code indicating whether the operation appeared to be atomic or not. If the processor determines that an intervening store from another processor or I/O device may have corrupted the data being loaded from memory (or stored to memory) the condition code is set to a value (cc=3 for example). The program would check this value 904 (with a Branch on Condition instruction for example) and would take action if the operation appeared to be non-atomic (cc=3) such as repeating the LSD instruction for a predetermined number of tries (such as 10 tries) until successful. In the embodiment, a predetermined count value 901 if not=0 906 would be decremented and the LPD instruction re-executed. If not successful in the number of tries a special routine 909 would be invoked that would use other interlocking means to perform the LSD storage operations atomically. Different embodiments would support either Load operations or Store operations, one or more disjoint operands to be accessed atomically, and indicators other than condition codes.

Preferably, this instruction is utilized for fetching disjoint memory operands in a program, the program executing a first routine 901 comprising instructions for fetching disjoint memory operands, said instructions comprising 902 a Load Pair Disjoint instruction, when executed 903 loading two disjoint operands from memory and setting a condition code value. A test is made 904 following execution of the LPD preferably by a Branch on Condition instruction. Responsive 905 the test determining said condition code value indicates (cc=3) the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, a second routine 909 is executed comprising instructions for fetching the disjoint memory operands from memory. Responsive to said condition code value (cc=0) indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, a third routine for using the loaded two disjoint operands is executed, the program 901 continues execution.

In an embodiment, the second routine is repeated until said condition code value (cc=0) indicates the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.

In an embodiment, a limit value (count value) 901 is set for repeating. Responsive to said condition code value (cc=3) indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, the second routine is repeated until either one of the second routine has repeated a number of times 906 specified by the limit value or the condition code value (cc=0) indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.

In an embodiment, the Load Pair Disjoint instruction causes the two disjoint operands to be loaded into respective positions of a general register. LOAD/STORE DISJOINT (LOAD PAIR DISJOINT) instruction

In an embodiment, a Load/Store Disjoint (LSD) instruction is executed in a processor of a multi-processor system FIG. 10. Referring to FIG. 7, a Load/Store Disjoint instruction is obtained 701 for execution to load data from memory 708 to general registers 707 of the processor, the Load/Store Disjoint instruction comprising an opcode, the execution comprising performing an LSD specified operation 702 based on the obtained opcode, the operation 702 comprising accessing one or more operands in memory. Responsive to determining 703 whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory, a first indicator value is set 705 706, said first indicator value indicating whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory.

In an embodiment, the first indicator value comprises any one of a first condition code value or a second condition code value. Responsive to determining 703 that a store event may have modified either a first operand in the memory or a second operand in the memory of the one or more operands during said accessing, the first condition code value is set 705, said first condition code value indicating any one of the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory may have been modified during said accessing. Responsive to determining 703 that a no store event has modified either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory during said accessing, the second condition code value is set 706, said second condition code value indicating neither the first operand in the memory nor the second operand in the memory were modified during said accessing.

In an embodiment FIG. 8, the LSD instruction is a Load Pair Disjoint (LPD) instruction, wherein the accessing the one or more operands in memory comprises fetching 805 a first operand and a second operand from memory further comprising 806 807 the fetched first operand is stored in a first register designated by the LPD instruction and the fetched second operand is stored in a second register designated by the LPD instruction.

In an embodiment, the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises a first general register field (B1) identifying a first general register, a second general register field (B2) identifying a second general register and a third general register field R3) identifying said first register and said second register, a first address is obtained 801 from the first general register identified by the first general register field and the obtained first address is used for the fetching the first operand in the memory. A second address of the second operand in the memory is obtained 802 from a second general register identified by the second general register field and the obtained second address is used for the fetching the second operand in memory. The Load Pair Disjoint operation comprises storing the first operand in the first register 806, wherein the first register is a high order portion of a general register identified by the third general register field and storing the second operand in the second register 807, wherein the second register is a low order portion of the general register identified by the third general register field.

In an embodiment, wherein the obtained Load Pair Disjoint instruction further comprises a first displacement field and a second displacement field, the first displacement field is arithmetically added 803 with the obtained first address to create a first memory address for the fetching the first operand in the memory. The second displacement field is arithmetically added 804 with the obtained second address to create a second memory address for the fetching the second operand in the memory.

In an embodiment, store events from a plurality of processors of the multi-processing system are received and data of the received store operations is stored in the memory.

In an embodiment, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction defined for an computer architecture is fetched and executed by a central processing unit of an alternate computer architecture, the Load Pair Disjoint instruction is interpreted to identify a predetermined software routine for emulating the operation of the Load Pair Disjoint instruction and the executing the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises executing the predetermined software routine to perform steps of the method for executing the machine instruction.

Referring to FIG. 6, which depicts two example forms of Load Pair Disjoint machine instructions (LPD and LPDG) of an architecture. The 48 bits of the instruction includes an opcode (bits 0-8: 12-15), an B1, B2 and an R3 field for designating respective first (B1), second (B2) and third (R3) general purpose registers, and displacement fields D1 and D2 for use in combination with contents of corresponding general purpose registers B1 and B2 to determine memory addresses of two operands to be fetched atomically (block-concurrently) without an intervening store from another processor unit while the two operands are being fetched.

General register R3 designates the even numbered register of an even/odd register pair. (the even register contains the high order bits and the odd register contains the low order bits of the pair).

When the instruction is executed, the first operand is placed unchanged into the even numbered register of the third operand, and the second operand is placed unchanged into odd-numbered register of the third operand and the condition code value is set in the condition code register. The condition code value indicates whether or not the first and second operands appear to be fetched by means of block-concurrent interlocked fetch. That is to say, that they appeared to be atomically executed without any intervening store from any other processor.

For LPD, the first and second operands are 32 bit “words” in storage, and the third operand is in bits 32-63 of general registers R3 and R3+1; bits 0-31 of the registers are unchanged. For LPDG, the first and second operands are 64 bit “doublewords” in storage, and the third operand is in bits 0-63 of general registers R3 and R3+1.

When, as observed by other CPUs, the first and second operands appear to be fetched by means of block-concurrent interlocked fetch, condition code 0 is set. When the first and second operands do not appear to be fetched by means of block-concurrent interlocked fetch (atomic operation), condition code 3 is set. The third operand is loaded regardless of the condition code.

The displacement of the first and second operands is treated as a 12-bit unsigned binary integer.

The first and second operands of LPD must be designated on a word boundary. The first and second operands of LPDG must be designated on a doubleword boundary. General register R3 must designate the even numbered register. Otherwise, a specification exception is recognized.

Resulting Condition Code:

0 Register pair loaded by means of interlocked fetch

1—

2—

3 Register pair not loaded by means of interlocked fetch

Program Exceptions:

-   -   Access (fetch, operands 1 and 2)     -   Operation (if the interlocked-access facility is not installed)     -   Specification

Programming Notes:

1. The setting of the condition code is dependent upon storage accesses by other CPUs in the configuration.

2. When the resulting condition code is 3, the program may branch back to re-execute the LOAD PAIR DISJOINT instruction. However, after repeated unsuccessful attempts to attain an interlocked fetch, the program should use an alternate means of serializing access to the storage operands. It is recommended that the program re-execute the LOAD PAIR DISJOINT no more than 10 times before branching to the alternate path.

3. The program should be able to accommodate a situation where condition code 0 is never set.

Referring to FIG. 10, an embodiment of the invention includes a plurality of n processors (P1 through Pn) 1001 1002 1003 1004 sharing a memory 1005 each processor 1001 may include caches for caching memory operands, Load/Store units for accessing data in memory. Execution units for performing function of instrucions based on the instruction opcode and Dynamic Address Translation (DAT) for translating virtual (logical) addresses into real (absolute) memory addresses including a TLB for caching DAT translations for improved performance. The processors may share peripheral devices 1006 (DASD/Tape) over a system bus or may have local peripheral devices.

The forgoing is useful in understanding the terminology and structure of one computer system embodiment. The present invention is not limited to the z/Architecture or to the description provided thereof. The present invention can be advantageously applied to other computer architectures of other computer manufacturers with the teaching herein.

While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described herein, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction herein disclosed, and the right is reserved to all changes and modifications coming within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product for executing a Load/Store Disjoint (LSD) instruction in a processor of a multi-processor system, the computer program product comprising a tangible storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising: obtaining a Load/Store Disjoint instruction for execution, the Load/Store Disjoint instruction comprising an opcode, the execution comprising: performing a LSD specified operation based on the obtained opcode, the operation comprising accessing one or more operands in memory; responsive to determining whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory, setting a first indicator value, said first indicator value indicating whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory.
 2. The computer program product according to claim 1, wherein the first indicator value comprises any one of a first condition code value or a second condition code value, the method further comprising: responsive to determining that a store event may have modified any one of a first operand in the memory or a second operand in the memory of the one or more operands during said accessing, setting the first condition code value, said first condition code value indicating either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory may have been modified during said accessing; and responsive to determining that a no store event has modified either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory during said accessing, setting the second condition code value, said second condition code value indicating neither the first operand in the memory nor the second operand in the memory were modified during said accessing.
 3. The computer program product according to claim 2, wherein the LSD instruction is a Load Pair Disjoint (LPD) instruction, wherein the accessing the one or more operands in memory comprises fetching a first operand and a second operand from memory, the method further comprising: storing the fetched first operand and the fetched second operand in a one or more registers designated by the LPD instruction.
 4. The computer program product according to claim 3, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises a first general register field identifying a first general register, a second general register field identifying a second general register and a third general register field identifying said first register and said second register, the method further comprising: obtaining a first address from the first general register identified by the first general register field; and using the obtained first address for the fetching the first operand in the memory; and obtaining a second address of the second operand in the memory from a second general register identified by the second general register field; and using the obtained second address for the fetching the second operand in memory; wherein the LSD specified operation is a Load Pair Disjoint operation wherein the one or more registers is a pair of registers consist of a first register and a second register, the first register at an even address specified by the third register field (R3) and the second register at an odd register address specified by an incremented third register field (R3+1), wherein the first operand is stored in the first register and the second operand is stored in the second register.
 5. The computer program product according to claim 4, wherein the obtained Load Pair Disjoint instruction further comprises a first displacement field and a second displacement field, the method further comprising: arithmetically adding the first displacement field and the obtained first address to create a first memory address for the fetching the first operand in the memory; and arithmetically adding the second displacement field and the obtained second address to create a second memory address for the fetching the second operand in the memory.
 6. The computer program product according to claim 1, further comprising: receiving store events from a plurality of processors of the multi-processing system; and storing data of the received store operations in the memory.
 7. The computer program product according to claim 5, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction defined for a computer architecture is fetched and executed by a central processing unit of an alternate computer architecture, the method further comprising: interpreting the Load Pair Disjoint instruction to identify a predetermined software routine for emulating the operation of the Load Pair Disjoint instruction; and executing the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises executing the predetermined software routine to perform steps of the method for executing the machine instruction.
 8. A computer system for executing a Load/Store Disjoint (LSD) instruction in a processor of a multi-processor system, comprising: a memory; a processing unit in communication with the memory, the processing unit comprising an instruction fetching unit for fetching instructions from memory and one or more execution units for executing fetched instructions, wherein the computer system is configured to perform a method comprising: obtaining a Load/Store Disjoint instruction for execution, the Load/Store Disjoint instruction comprising an opcode, the execution comprising: performing a LSD specified operation based on the obtained opcode, the operation comprising accessing one or more operands in memory; responsive to determining whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory, setting a first indicator value, said first indicator value indicating whether a store event from another processor of the multi-processor system may have modified one of the one or more operands during the accessing the one or more operands in memory.
 9. The computer system according to claim 8, wherein the first indicator value comprises any one of a first condition code value or a second condition code value, the method further comprising: responsive to determining that a store event may have modified any one of a first operand in the memory or a second operand in the memory of the one or more operands during said accessing, setting the first condition code value, said first condition code value indicating either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory may have been modified during said accessing; and responsive to determining that a no store event has modified either the first operand in the memory or the second operand in the memory during said accessing, setting the second condition code value, said second condition code value indicating neither the first operand in the memory nor the second operand in the memory were modified during said accessing.
 10. The computer system according to claim 9, wherein the LSD instruction is a Load Pair Disjoint (LPD) instruction, wherein the accessing the one or more operands in memory comprises fetching a first operand and a second operand from memory, the method further comprising: storing the fetched first operand and the fetched second operand in a one or more registers designated by the LPD instruction.
 11. The computer system according to claim 10, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises a first general register field identifying a first general register, a second general register field identifying a second general register and a third general register field identifying said first register and said second register, the method further comprising: obtaining a first address from the first general register identified by the first general register field; and using the obtained first address for the fetching the first operand in the memory; and obtaining a second address of the second operand in the memory from a second general register identified by the second general register field; and using the obtained second address for the fetching the second operand in memory; wherein the LSD specified operation is a Load Pair Disjoint operation wherein the one or more registers is a pair of registers consist of a first register and a second register, the first register at an even address specified by the third register field (R3) and the second register at an odd register address specified by an incremented third register field (R3+1), wherein the first operand is stored in the first register and the second operand is stored in the second register.
 12. The computer system according to claim 11, wherein the obtained Load Pair Disjoint instruction further comprises a first displacement field and a second displacement field, the method further comprising: arithmetically adding the first displacement field and the obtained first address to create a first memory address for the fetching the first operand in the memory; and arithmetically adding the second displacement field and the obtained second address to create a second memory address for the fetching the second operand in the memory.
 13. The computer system according to claim 8, further comprising: receiving store events from a plurality of processors of the multi-processing system; and storing data of the received store operations in the memory.
 14. The computer system according to claim 12, wherein the Load Pair Disjoint instruction defined for a computer architecture is fetched and executed by a central processing unit of an alternate computer architecture, the method further comprising: interpreting the Load Pair Disjoint instruction to identify a predetermined software routine for emulating the operation of the Load Pair Disjoint instruction; and executing the Load Pair Disjoint instruction comprises executing the predetermined software routine to perform steps of the method for executing the machine instruction.
 15. A computer program product for fetching disjoint memory operands, the computer program product comprising a tangible storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising: executing by a processor a first routine comprising one or more instructions for fetching disjoint memory operands, said instructions comprising a Load Pair Disjoint instruction for loading two disjoint operands from memory and setting a condition code value; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands from another processor, causing a second routine comprising instructions for fetching the disjoint memory operands from memory to be executed; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, proceeding to a third routine for using the loaded two disjoint operands.
 16. The computer program product according to claim 15, further comprising: causing the second routine to be repeated until said condition code value indicates the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.
 17. The computer program product according to claim 15, further comprising: setting a limit value for repeating; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, causing the second routine to be repeated until either one of the second routine has repeated a number of times specified by the limit value or the condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.
 18. The computer program product according to claim 15, the method further comprising loading the two disjoint operands into respective positions of a general register.
 19. A computer system for fetching disjoint memory operands, comprising: a memory; a processing unit in communication with the memory, the processing unit comprising an instruction fetching unit for fetching instructions from memory and one or more execution units for executing fetched instructions, wherein the computer system is configured to perform a method comprising: executing by a processor a first routine comprising one or more instructions for fetching disjoint memory operands, said instructions comprising a Load Pair Disjoint instruction for loading two disjoint operands from memory and setting a condition code value; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands from another processor, causing a second routine comprising instructions for fetching the disjoint memory operands from memory to be executed; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, proceeding to a third routine for using the loaded two disjoint operands.
 20. The system according to claim 19, further comprising: causing the second routine to be repeated until said condition code value indicates the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.
 21. The system according to claim 19, further comprising: setting a limit value for repeating; responsive to said condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands may have been loaded with an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands, causing the second routine to be repeated until either one of the second routine has repeated a number of times specified by the limit value or the condition code value indicating the two disjoint operands were loaded without an intervening store to either of the two disjoint operands.
 22. The system according to claim 19, the method further comprising loading the two disjoint operands into respective positions of a general register. 